This is a placeholder text
Group text
by AsuraOniGiri on 03 March 2024 - 16:03
by stormins on 04 March 2024 - 23:03
by jbaker1980 on 06 March 2024 - 10:03
by LMA on 06 March 2024 - 14:03
I would also agree with @jbaker1980. The outward expressions of a given dog will be more affected within the first few generations. I have seen studies of breeders concerned of excessive lineage, but usually what that translates into is the extreme use of fewer or one stud. Personally, I would bet most people would not discard any of those dogs mentioned by the OP, base on phenotype(observable traits) or genotype (gene make-up). I do look farther back to see how consistently the dogs have been bred type to type, and to get a general sense of how well traits and appearance are passed on over the lineage. For my money, gene diversity, but with congruence of traits and appearance is idea. Some people ascribe heavily to the "breed 'em tight - breed 'em right adage", and there's validity to it, but outcrossing is neccessary at somepoint, lest you want degradation to structure and abilities. The opposite is true, intentionally or out of ignorance, where there is no breeding program, and every litter is an open breeding. I've been touch and go for a while on importing from a Czech veterinarian breeder, whose approach I think matches my preferrence. If the "world" ever settles down, I will probably go ahead. He uses WG/Czech working lines and one of my females is heavily influenced by his program. She's spectacular, and her lineage goes back to all three dogs in the OP's question. Yet, the breeder seems to know propper new genes to pull in to his program, based on the successes of Martin Pejsa.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top