Teejay vom Wilhendorf - Page 1

Wondering what happened to the topic from globalhaus about Teejay? If the organization wants to investigate this fraud they should start at the SV with Harold Hohmann as this litter was born in Knittlingen. Jochen Janz brought the pups to the US as he stated and at the time a man named Ron Letore coowned the litter and was unable to take his pup (Teejay). The mother never returned to the US and Harold had to spay her in the next litter and placed her with a neighbor.  
It would be easy enough for the SV to investigate and put the rumors behind this. Bout time someone came clean.

May I suggest if you wish the Organization to investigate this matter then contact them with your concerns.  

You seem from your post to be in position of the needed paper work and proofs.
 
Don't come here making statements that look like you are just wanting to start trouble 

Give the Organization that you refer to the information then come here and let us know what They did with it.

Western Rider

 

Amen, Western Rider.

I thought the confusion of the situation was cleared up when it was shown that for the WDA's purposes, the definition of 'American-bred' referred to the nationality of at least one of the breeders-of-record on the AKC registration of the litter.  It has nothing to do with where the mating took place, or where the dog was whelped. Thus, so long as at least one of the breeders-of-record for this dog is an American citizen, the criteria is met.

Hexe, that copy of the rules that Blitzen posted is only two months old.

True, so it would appear that there was a need for WDA to officially define the term  'American-bred' in writing, just as there was a need for USCA to officially define the term 'H.O.T.' several years ago. 

If you notice, the H.O.T. definition only requires the handler/owner to be the one to TITLE the dog, not to also be the one who trained the dog.  So if you've got the money, you can ship your dog to someone who's a better trainer than you are, and then take the finished product out on the trial field for the titling. Or you can import a trained but untitled dog , and then do the titling yourself and call it an H.O.T. accomplishment.  There's always going to be a loophole; it's the way of the world these days. Every sentence, every phrase, every term and every word has to be parsed, because there is always going to be someone looking for an angle, and there's always going to be someone who will complain about someone else.  It's why I like animals much better than people.

Sounds to me like a very big bunch of sour grapes. If there is any merit to the accusations, why are they not being presented in the form of a petition to the WDA et al?

I believe Markobytes is saying that the current rules addressing American Bred have only been in effect for a few months? If that's so, then anyone who wants to challenge Teejay's/Wilhendorf's eligibility needs to get hold of a copy of the rules that were in effect when the Am Bred designation was presented. What does the SV have to do with this?

Keep in mind that it was NOT actually Globalhaus Kennel that posted that original post, but someone posing as them fraudulently. That should give you an idea of the actual intention of the entire post.
Theresa

Exactly!! If they have a legit beef, then why are they not taking it to the WDA et al instead of hiding behind the kennel name of a respected breeder? That in itself speaks volumes.