WUSV meetings and minutes 2010 and 2012 .. the smoking gun - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by gsdstudent on 06 March 2013 - 20:03

dear bubba; you seem to gloat about any mis-step by UScA. Does it give you pleasure to see trouble inside of the breed? Your evidence provided a glimse of politics and there are quotes in your paragraphs about GSDCA giving false statements about the UScA. Two wrongs will never make a right. I want to give the current adminastration a chance to mend fences and heal wounds. All GSD enthusiaits  should want clarity and vision not finger pointing.

by Bob McKown on 06 March 2013 - 20:03

bubb:

      Did somebody from UScA take you on a date and do you and never called you back ? 

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 06 March 2013 - 20:03

The majority membership of the USCA says they didn't want the exclusion rule but yet they was never able to summon the necessary guts to rescind it.  Either the membership is too weak or too gutless to control the Officers and board or they were happy to go along with a rule they knew was wrong regardless of what the WUSV rules said.  In what universe does excluding people from trials and telling them that their SV accepted scorebooks are invalid seem right.  In most cases these were people the USCA club members had trained and trialed with before.  That the membership of the USCA ( approximately 2500 - 3000 ) not the 5000 they claimed in 2003 (another lie) would allow this speaks volumes about their character and values and it is not a pretty picture.  The GSDCA and GSDCA-WDA have just as much right to breed their type GSD as the USCA membership has to breed and trial their type.  There is no one complete GSD for all jobs and all uses.  I don't think the GSDCA and the GSDCA-WDA will ever forgive and forget the deceit and tactics employed by Roetemeyer and friends.  We would be fools to ever trust people who wanted to wipe us out and to what end???  You let it happen so now the USCA can live with the consequences.

by gsdstudent on 06 March 2013 - 21:03

I was at the meeting and spoke against the JA motion which carried when voted on. Again I ask of you bubba, do you benefit from the problem you point out? I bet if  allowed to heal this division  is not unsurmountable. Look at the thread started by K Nance. It is a possible solution. Or continue your rendition of Billy Joel's '' Angry young man''





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top