
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by reptilesmile on 26 September 2010 - 18:09
I'm just doing a little research about german shepherds for something i'm writing. I grew up with one, and I know her father is on this pedigree database..(another story haha) anyway, what would you guys say is the main difference between GSDs now and back in, let's say 1930, 1940,1950s. Not so much health-wise, but I mean with appearance and traits. I saw some very interesting photos from back in the 30s and 40s here on the database, but I cannto locate them anymore.
I do think I like the hindlegs on GSDs back in the days. Nowadays (not on here as far as I know) - but around internet and such, you see GSDs with veryy bent legs, and I know that's what some think looks pretty, and I do like the GSD pose, though I think some look very unnatural with the slopy back and overly bent legs.
well, as I was saying, what would you say was the typical german shepherd in around the 30s - 50s, mentally and bodytype, and has it changed much? :)

by KYLE on 26 September 2010 - 19:09
http://www.nsgsdc.com/breedhistory.shtml
Kyle

by micheleambernick on 26 September 2010 - 19:09
The rear legs don't give support to the back part of the dog. The rear hip joint has to support this part of the body. This leaves the joint more open to injury with any quick change in direction. The GSD now only achieves real balance when in forward motion.
References to a "full support" position in the GSD have been made in connection to balance. In some German Shepherd manuals the skeletal structure looks nothing like the GSD today. (Barwig et al, 1986) This raises questions on what should be correct for this breed. At any case what might have been true in 1950 is no longer so.
Static and kinetic balance as well as gravity should be looked at and evaluated.
American GSDs in daily routine need to be able to spin, change direction and walk without a loss of balance, which at this time they don't have. Consideration should be taken to breed a GSD that can function in all it is many facets. In trials of agility, balance, endurance and strength this breed is lacking what all other herding breeds have balance.
The origin of the GSD shows a different body type with the feet set more closely under the body.
Refer to 1950's Axel vd Deininghauserheide and others like 1953's Alert of Mi-Noah's which you see dogs built like other herding breeds we see today. I advocate a change in breeding and also suggest that the common hip problems in the GSD might be greatly lessened.
Let it be noted that many of the working German line GSDs today are extremely well balanced with excellent temperament. American GSD breeders need to take their blinders off to see what a REAL GSD is all about.
by reptilesmile on 26 September 2010 - 19:09
I'm european, and I know we had a "breed of dogs" book from the 80s, and even in this book, the hind legs of the GSD is a bit different than what many look like today, (the picture might be older than the book too i reckon)
i wasn't asking to start a flamewar, haha, i was just curious as to the changes and such, especially with pics of dogs. (link much appreciated!)

by Two Moons on 26 September 2010 - 19:09
by Jeff Oehlsen on 27 September 2010 - 06:09

by Carlin on 27 September 2010 - 15:09

by Prager on 27 September 2010 - 18:09
pretty good but few details here.
Pigment is extremely important in working dogs(!) since loss of pigmentation is a first sign of degeneration.
It is funny that dogs in 50ties fit into the standard as well as modern show dogs now do.
There is an important rule of thumb as far as looks of the dog goes . Dog should be within the standard and must be able to work, run, jump, search, track and kick ass for real and be a good family member.
I firmly believe that modern working dog ( not sport or show dog) is a better dog now then it was "back then" The important thing is that such dog needs to be recognized and promoted to general public.
Modern working dog in spirit of old type GSD.
my ideal dog DOB 2007 Fram z Jirkova dvora aka Haio
.jpg)
1920

1930ties

1960ties
.jpg)
2000ts
.jpg)
As you can see the working dogs are getting heavier and more massive. Even so these here are great dogs I believe wee need to go to more wiry dry dog like the dog on the very top (Fram z Jirkova dvora aka Haio. )
Look at ideal dog from 1925 according to great Max v Stephanitz Klodo v Boxberg. I like to compare structure of any dog to him (personally) :
Klodo v Boxberg DOB 1921.
.jpg)
Prager Hans
http://www.alpinek9.com

by KYLE on 27 September 2010 - 22:09
Interesting view in an article from about 15 years about about work and show.
"Best Working Bloodline
P H: Roger, what in your opinion is the top working bloodline today?
PEETERS: I must say, Link Muikenshof, a Jago v Nesselbach son, at a qualifier a month ago in my country, eight of the top 10 dogs were "Link" sons. I also like to see Dasso v Bodelschwingher Schloss, he produces excellently. I also like to see some East German dogs. I like to use some Lord Gleisdriek to help with the hips and to make the head wider and the muzzle shorter. "Sagus" and Grief" are excellent in the pedigree. Mainly I just don't like to see show blood.
What is important is the short, wide muzzle. It really helps in the power of the biting. But I have never seen a dog that produces like Link. These dogs are very clear in the head and love the work. Let me say one thing, never try to cross working and show bloodlines. It will only lead to disaster! You have more of a chance of winning a $25 million lottery than getting a good dog from show lines."
http://www.specialistcanines.com/general-training-articles/1620-trainers-roger-peeters-and-jan-kokx.html
Kyle

by Uber Land on 27 September 2010 - 23:09
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/classifieds/107058.html
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top