SV website announcement Team Marlboro Jaguar - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Videx

by Videx on 14 January 2012 - 10:01

SV-HG (01/12)
Wichtige Information!
Der ED-Befund für den Rüden „Team Marlboro Jaguar“ (Vater des Siegers in der JHKL Rüden der SV-Bundessiegerzuchtschau 2011) muss derzeit als „unklar“ angesehen werden.
Der eingetragene ED-Befund aus Deutschland ist „normal“ und der entsprechende Befund aus Schweden lautet auf „mittlere ED“.
Auf Initiative des SV haben die verantwortlichen Gutachter in Deutschland und Schweden die beiden Aufnahmen verglichen und sind übereinstimmend zu dem Ergebnis gekommen, dass es sich um Aufnahmen verschiedener Hunde handelt.
Nach Abschluss der weiteren Überprüfungen werden wir umgehend über mögliche Auswirkungen informieren.
 
Computer translation

SV-Hauptgeschäftsstelle
Important information!
The ED findings for the Rüden „Team Marlboro Jaguar “ (Vater des Siegers in der JHKL Rüden der SV-Bundessiegerzuchtschau 2011) must be regarded at present as „unclear “. The registered ED findings made of Germany are „normal“ and the appropriate findings made of Sweden are expressed in „middle ED “. On initiative of the SV the responsible persons consultants in Germany and Sweden compared the two photographs and agreeing to the result came that it concerns photographs of different dogs. After conclusion of the further examinations we will inform immediately about possible effects.

by opa on 14 January 2012 - 13:01

bump

by SitasMom on 15 January 2012 - 05:01

wasnt this mentioned by a differen member a few weeks ago......and the topic was pulled?


by Mackenzie on 15 January 2012 - 07:01

This information was first posted by Jantie a short time ago and the moderater intervened and it was removed.

Mackenzie


Dog1

by Dog1 on 15 January 2012 - 09:01

The difference being the post above is information regarding the issue posted by the SV as they look into the matter. The previous post was a dramatic conclusion that a dog and all of it's offspring would be banned before the issue was addressed by those that made the decisions. The topic was pulled as conclusions and accusations were made before official results were published.

The issue has been identified and is being addressed. May as well follow the developments as they are looked into and released. This is not the first time an issue similar to this has been brought up. The SV reviews it and makes a decision based on the information they review.

Skylagsd

by Skylagsd on 15 January 2012 - 13:01

People make accusations and get to conclusions here all the time before any or all information is revealed.  Whats the difference? 

Skylagsd

by Skylagsd on 15 January 2012 - 13:01

By the way dog1 Love the head on your dog very beautiful.


by SitasMom on 15 January 2012 - 14:01

if the above is true, what happens to the person who submitted the incorrect xrays?
the dog's pedigree? and the pedigrees of all the pupps and grand pups?
 

 


Videx

by Videx on 16 January 2012 - 02:01

That is covered, as far as it can be at this point in time, by the last sentence in the SV statement.

by GSD MAN on 16 January 2012 - 04:01

I'm curious to see what the outcome will be by the SV.  Will SG1 Harley be stripped from his title?





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top