This is a placeholder text
Group text
by judron55 on 29 November 2011 - 18:11
by MVF on 29 November 2011 - 20:11
Well, why not? He is a fine dog. But he sure doesn't look like 44 kilos in that pic. He must be thicker than he looks there, or taller than 65 cm, as it states. A lot of tall dogs can reported at 65 cm, I think.
by cphudson on 29 November 2011 - 20:11
Like his pedigree & nice looking dog. I just don't like the way he is being stacked in the photo.
by Fenrir on 29 November 2011 - 21:11
I am a big fan of Karthago dogs :) and a great grandson of Norbo Ben-Ju. I think it is a great mix of lines and bet the dog has some pretty solid drives, good looking too. I don't like the stack very much either.
by judron55 on 29 November 2011 - 23:11
forget the stacking of the dog....if you can, look at his bite work.
by hexe on 30 November 2011 - 01:11
Fenrir, I've noticed that odd kind of stack seems to crop up fairly often with the Czech dogs...the look like they'd like to bolt as soon as the handler releases their hold on them. ;)
This IS a damn good looking dog, and the bite works photos look pretty intense.
MVF, I didn't think he looked like he weighed nearly 97# in the pic at the top of the page, either, but then in looking at the rest of the photos and getting a better idea of his musculature and body length, I can see where he'd come in around that weight, even @ 65 cms. While certainly within the standard, personally I prefer dogs that fall into the mid-point of the range for height and weight: to me, an ideal bitch in fit condition won't run more than 68-70#, and a male would be under 80#. That said, I sure wouldn't wave this dog away if someone walked up and offered him to me. <G>
This IS a damn good looking dog, and the bite works photos look pretty intense.
MVF, I didn't think he looked like he weighed nearly 97# in the pic at the top of the page, either, but then in looking at the rest of the photos and getting a better idea of his musculature and body length, I can see where he'd come in around that weight, even @ 65 cms. While certainly within the standard, personally I prefer dogs that fall into the mid-point of the range for height and weight: to me, an ideal bitch in fit condition won't run more than 68-70#, and a male would be under 80#. That said, I sure wouldn't wave this dog away if someone walked up and offered him to me. <G>
by hunger4justice on 30 November 2011 - 03:11
Here is an entire page of videos from 5 months old to 2 years that are not all on You Tube of the dog...impressive:
http://www.majoruvhaj.cz/sorbon/sorbon_video/sorbon_video.html
http://www.majoruvhaj.cz/sorbon/sorbon_video/sorbon_video.html
by SKI on 30 November 2011 - 04:11
Ron - I saw the post from before.
Like the combo. Rosso producing good size males. Our Rosso son, from our G breeding, is a not quite filled out 92 lbs. Fast. agile. Take down helpers. Excellent temperament The male from our current breeding to Rosso has incredible bone, drives and attitude.
Like the mother line as well. Chuna brought in to states by husband, knew both her and Norbo well.
Like the combo. Rosso producing good size males. Our Rosso son, from our G breeding, is a not quite filled out 92 lbs. Fast. agile. Take down helpers. Excellent temperament The male from our current breeding to Rosso has incredible bone, drives and attitude.
Like the mother line as well. Chuna brought in to states by husband, knew both her and Norbo well.
by Red Sable on 30 November 2011 - 10:11
I like him too.
by alexander the great on 01 December 2011 - 09:12
beautiful dog but i dont like when shepherds legs go back like a jumping frog ??
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
