This is a placeholder text
Group text
by GSD MAN on 19 March 2011 - 05:03
.jpg)
by GSD MAN on 19 March 2011 - 05:03
by GSD MAN on 22 March 2011 - 02:03
by Ruger1 on 22 March 2011 - 03:03
The site has been slow lately that may be why you are not getting more responses...: )
IMO the picture is on a bad angle and the lighting is casting some shadows. It would be hard to get an honest critique of his structure and his color with a picture like this ...
Perhaps posting a different picture might get more replies...: )
IMO I think your male has a nice solid looking structure...Nice top line and good tail set....I would like to see another picture.....: )
Deanna...: )
by unclemick on 22 March 2011 - 03:03
by GSD MAN on 26 March 2011 - 04:03
by GSD MAN on 26 March 2011 - 16:03
BUMP.......
by eichenluft on 26 March 2011 - 16:03
second pic is better. Good things IMO - great head, nice enough pigment (indoor/flash shot can wash him out more than he really is). Nice looking dog overall, masculine and strong-looking. Nice topline.
Negatives IMO - flat feet, loose ligmentation in the front pasterns and rear also (could tighten up when he's older and in better physical shape). Straight shoulder, and rear is a bit too over-angulated for my taste.
Overall a good looking dog though.
molly
by GSD MAN on 27 March 2011 - 23:03
.jpg)
Another picture
by GSD MAN on 21 April 2011 - 16:04
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top