
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Rioko on 10 July 2010 - 16:07
Im into showline, i know a lot of good showlines out there like larus,quenn,yasko,zamp,vegas..etc
I wanna know whos the best working line gsd out there it may be past or current....thx guys. just want to know
more about gsds.
I wanna know whos the best working line gsd out there it may be past or current....thx guys. just want to know
more about gsds.
by Jeff Oehlsen on 11 July 2010 - 07:07
I am not the master, but this is my favorite all time GSD.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9s62o_ulko-a-brive-finale-ring-2009_sport
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9s62o_ulko-a-brive-finale-ring-2009_sport

by darylehret on 11 July 2010 - 17:07
Basically I'd say, if you want popular producers, it betrays your showline mentality. "Best" in workinglines I believe is more dynamic, like a "presidency", where your showlines are probably more static, like an "aristocracy."
The importance of any particular-named working dog should be proportional to the required balance of the overall breed population's particular needs of the time.
That is, provided we can all agree what those needs are, which we can't seem to do.
So really, there's no "best", when it's all so relative, and then complicated by multiple intermingled characteristics sought by breeders of varying priorities. Knowing what it is you want, and going the the lines/breeders that are known for producing that, is a more satisfying approach.
The importance of any particular-named working dog should be proportional to the required balance of the overall breed population's particular needs of the time.
That is, provided we can all agree what those needs are, which we can't seem to do.
So really, there's no "best", when it's all so relative, and then complicated by multiple intermingled characteristics sought by breeders of varying priorities. Knowing what it is you want, and going the the lines/breeders that are known for producing that, is a more satisfying approach.
There's dogs that do, dogs that don't,
dogs that can't and dogs that won't.
For you, a dog that'll do for you, is a dog that'll do.
(-: Daryl :-)

by Steve Schuler on 11 July 2010 - 18:07
I think this bears repeating:
"There's dogs that do, dogs that don't,
dogs that can't and dogs that won't.
For you, a dog that'll do for you, is a dog that'll do."
Good thought, Daryl!
SteveO

by Steve Schuler on 11 July 2010 - 19:07
@Rioko
Hey Dude, or Dudette, as the case may be!
There is a current thread that deals with the same question that you have. See it here:
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/forum/48347.html?pagen=1
Or just scroll down on the index page to check it out. It is entitled, "People who know a lot about working lines, HELP! "
Hope this helps,
SteveO.
Hey Dude, or Dudette, as the case may be!
There is a current thread that deals with the same question that you have. See it here:
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/forum/48347.html?pagen=1
Or just scroll down on the index page to check it out. It is entitled, "People who know a lot about working lines, HELP! "
Hope this helps,
SteveO.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top