Qualification trial - Page 4

We're not going anywhere Bob. Either have a fair qualification trial (impartial neutral DVG or FCI judge)
or go with the old split team rule.

Thomas Barriano

I'll go for importing FCI judges!

Looks like in another year or so the whole argument will be moot! 

"The Argument will be moot" based on What?
If the GSDCA pulls off the 2013 WUSV? They'll be around for a long while no matter what UScA says or does.

Thomas Barriano

I,m sure the GSDCA will be around. 

Bob,

If  you've got a point to make, then make it. I don't have time for guessing games

Thomas Barriano

Maybe Bob is inferring to the UScA pulling out of the WUSV, or maybe he's inferring Bob himself starting a RSV2000 club so it wont matter to him, or maybe Bob is inferring to the USA not having a qualification trial any more....its a mystery!

Unknown, I said THE TEAM. And the team this year and every other year is comprised primarily of people that make all or part of their income from dogs. You can dislike that fact, but it's a fact.

Personally I think we should keep this in mind when we make decisions about the directions our clubs take. Just think about it.

For all my slower friends here:

                                            I,m sure the GSDCA will be here for a long time. Now the WDA that is another matter. If the WUSV says no to Yee,s latest whine then they will continue to have to qualify as before if the trend keeps tracking, small #,s at national working dog events and not being able to round out top 10 competitors for the qualifications just how long will it be till the GSDCA finds there not getting enough from there agreement and when USA starts filling 4 or even all 5 slots to the Worlds ? Without the GSDCA agreement the WDA is dead in the water. It,s obvious that they can,t supply enough trials for there own members thats why Yee had to whine to the WUSV in the first place. I,m just reading the writing on the wall as I,m sure Yee has with his last Request.

Again the WDA is a parasitic organization It has to have agreements to get German judges thru the GSDCA and it relies on the USCA for enough trial to sustain it,s own members needs.
 
Thesaurus:  having the nature or habits of a parasite or leech; living off another
   
                                                                                                                                                                        Bob McKown
 

speaking of whining.

and why is it so important for some to "win" some stupid  argument????????  train your dogs and trial, who gives  what your membership card says.  It's the same damn standard at a trial.  What do I care if a WDA member wants to trial next to me?

and plenty, and I do mean plenty of UScA members have used  WDA clubs for KKL, breed surveys, and confo shows because they always fly SV judges over from Germany.  It's not a one way street.  The UScA has a list of complaints against it as long or longer than the WDA over the years.  Anybody that's been a part of it long enough knows it.   But it's been said before.  I'm a lot happier with the current guys at the top in UScA, but I still don't understand why people want to be so exclusionary????