This is a placeholder text
Group text
by ggturner on 25 January 2011 - 23:01
by jmopaso on 26 January 2011 - 01:01
The theriogenoligists actually are saying that there may be no detrimental affects to bitches or puppies from breeding back to back litters. It has been a long established fact in horses that it is better to keep a broodmare bred than not.
It all depends on how the individual recovers. In my experience, not as a breeder, but as a vet tech, if the bitch has not recovered well and is not ready , then she won't conceive on back to back litters. Their bodies often know what they are up to doing.
Mother nature really does know best in many cases.
by Jeff Oehlsen on 26 January 2011 - 06:01
I am not some mad scientist, but too many times people will say NEVER, when the answer is yes you can, and it will not hurt a healthy bitch. Not sure where you got the idea that I think that bitches should be bred every single time, but I have had bitches that were really really good producers and yes, they produced back to back to back.
It also depends on your goals. If you just want a pup or something then, why in Gods name would you breed like that ? : ) If you are trying to create your own line, and you have a bitch that is really making you happy with everything, then yes you breed that one as much as you need. I had a few like that and they were always happy. The weird size thing is genetic. NOT the bitch. I can tell you that they were pretty happy and when retired from breeding they were not happy unless they were surrounded by pups. It was what they knew.
Quote: Jeff--as a mother and a Biology teacher, I can tell you that being pregnant, giving birth, and nursing are hard on the mother's body.
I have to make fun here. You are a human being. What kind of shape were you in before you were pregnant ? What did you eat ? I doubt that you were no where in the shape that most dogs........ who are designed to give birth more than once a year. You are human, and they are dogs. Not comparable at all.
I see someone already told you about the article. It is crap. I absolutely am not joking when I say that way too many people out there in internet land are repeaters. They just tell you what they heard. Then you add in the "agenda" that often comes with the urge to actually write an artice.......... for money, and you end up with crap.
The bitches that people have gotten the whole idea of NEVER EVER breeding back to back from are pretty much NEVER EVER supposed to have been bred. You know, the ones that melt down and lose way to much hair, weight, muscle tone, ect. THey are not able to deal with it, and should never be bred again.
Many people want to improve the breed, but want to breed to bitches that melt like butter in the sun when bred.
I have a maiden bitch who has 10 pups and they are fat, SHE is fat, (good grief) and now that they are two weeks old, wants to muck about and run around with a stick like she did before she was prego. She is a MAD chick. At least this part of the deal she is doing really really well with. Now, if the pups are just not doorknobs, that would be great. Gotta find out what the deal is there.
Long way of saying that,
1, IF you are starting a breeding program and want your own line, then why not breed a bitch back to bakc to back and see if she can deal with it. That is a pretty basic thing that you need to know to have a viable line.
2, I am not talking the person that "just wants a pup". I personally believe that they are the ones that should not be breeding, as you want just one. LOL
3, Making money is not a shameful thing as SOOOOOOO many people on here say. Selling crap dogs is a shame, show line dogs are a shame, ( ha ha ) You will never see people selling horses crying about the money that they get for the damn things. Dogs are LIVESTOCK people. I learned that in the kennel business. And not in a way that I wanted to learn either.
4, Look at what people are saying, and ask yourself are you agreeing with it because it is an opinion that you like ? Why are you believing something. Did you have ONE bad experience ? Are you su
by Jeff Oehlsen on 26 January 2011 - 06:01
WHOSE ethics then ? Why is it responsible ? I worked with people doing research when I was younger that had a theory and only applied what went along with what they "theorized" was the correct answer. LOL That is what you did, you went and looked for something that went along with what you think is responsible. You did not go out and look for the truth, just what you wanted to hear. You are an opinion shopper. : )
Quote: Biologically speaking, a female dog can have two litters a year. Biologically speaking, a female human can give birth and within 3 months after giving birth can conceive again. Just because it is biologically possible doesn't mean it is in the best interest for the health of the female.
Ok, so this seems to be your premise. What research have you done, other than assume that a human, who is not bred by any other means than they want a baby, or had sex and forgot chemicals to block the pregnancy is the same as a dog that is bred for performance, has a gestation time that is 7 months quicker, and is basically in better shape and eats better than every single human female on the planet ??
See where this is going ? Children are not livestock. Dogs are. Think how many people if they were bred by a dog breeders standards would EVER give birth ?
by noddi on 26 January 2011 - 09:01
by Jeff Oehlsen on 26 January 2011 - 11:01
Dogs do not work like wolves, and do not really have the pack structure of wolves. However, I do not see what "In the wild" has to do with livestock. How you jumped from livestock to wild is beyond me.
Quote: So,all these bitches at puppy mills/farms(as they are known here in the uk)MUST BE OK AND HEALTHY COZ THEY ARE ABLE TO MANAGE TO PRODUCE PUPS SEASON AFTER SEASON THEN????????????NOT IN MY BOOKS THEY AINT.
When did I mention puppy mills ? I have no idea how you jumped over on this one as well. However I have seen rescue bitches that came from a puppy mill and she had been bred every single time she came into heat until they were shut down. The paperwork said she was 8, and had had 16 litters. She was fine when I saw her last, and she was 13. That was a few years ago. One example though, I imagine some didn't do as well.
Quote: My bitches would and could produce large litters season after season if i wished to subject them to this cruelty
How is it cruel, and how could you know unless you did it ? Your straw man arguement of taking everything said to the farthest possible reaches and beyond is not going to work here. You are not trying to do anything as far as making a line, you are occasionally breeding. Why take it all and blow it up like this ?
Quote: BUT THE MAJORITY COME FROM IRRESPONSIBLE BREEDERS WHO MATE THEIR BITCHES BACK TO BACK TO BACK TO BACK ETC.AND SO IT GOES ON.
Still we are not talking about the same thing at all. You are talking about puppy mills. I was not talking about puppy mills. It is all right to have feelings about puppy mills, but leave them out of this, as no one is talking puppy mill.
Quote: I take it that yu are a W/L person.DO YU RETAIN ALL YOUR PUPS THEN ??
Why would I keep them all ??
Quote: Yu speak as us show ppl.only have crap dogs.Sorry not the case.
Show us a video of your dogs working. I would love to be proven wrong.
Quote: IMO OPINION PPL.WHO CONTINUE TO BREED THEIR BITCHES SEASON AFTER SEASON SHOULD BE THE ONES WHO SHOULD NOT BREED NOT THE ONE WHO WANTS TO KEEP A PUP TO CONTINUE THEIR LINE BE IT SHOW,WORKING,OBEDIENCE ,AGILITY OR COMPANION
What line ? You want one pup, and cruelly breed a bitch to get just one pup, when you could just go and buy one. See how selfish that is ? : ) Yes, at this point I am teasing you, as maybe you are getting a little emotional. That or you keep hitting the cap key.
Quote: .i personally havent a problem with joe public breeding the occasional litter as long as both parents are health tested and passed.Carole Spelman
Here in the states, it is not the breeders that are causing the problem, but joe public breeding litters and not having anyone wanting them, they go to the shelter. It is the occasional litter multiplied by thousands that causes problems. All for one pup. They all say that you know, "Bob is such a good dog, we just wanted one pup from him. Never occurred to them to cull, just let someone else do it.
by ggturner on 26 January 2011 - 14:01
by mrdarcy on 26 January 2011 - 16:01
by Abby Normal on 26 January 2011 - 17:01
by Jeff Oehlsen on 26 January 2011 - 21:01
Where is this belittling going on ? I have bred bitches back to back to back and so on. I actually have experience with this. Do you ? With more than one bitch ? So whose opinion is based on experience, and whose opinion is based on how they feel ?
You can call me a doorknob. I don't care about that kind of thing, however, I can see that you are upset about this. It is not easy for people when they find out that what they have thought for so long is not correct.
It is easy, as you can see for people to go to bizarre lengths and start talking about puppy mills and abuse and basically try and blow it all out of proportion.
Just because someone says that a bitch not only can have back to back litters, and for years, but can do it and be healthy and happy doesn't fit peoples ideals of what is right and wrong doesn't mean that you should get upset.
We plan dogs breedings. We choose stud dogs, we research pedigrees, we do all the things that livestock people do. That is why they are classified as livestock. Just because Walt Disney gave them human voices doesn't change anything as far as reality goes. You sell off excess sheep, or cows, just like you sell puppies. They are not your children, as it is not legal to sell children. : )
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top