
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by vonissk on 11 August 2013 - 21:08
Aw Ibrahim you are beginning to make this come alive to me now. Thank you so much. I want to post a pic of a dog and have you do a critique on him. And BTW Blitzen, I just saw a showline dog that looked like his tail was coming right out of his but. Bad needless to say. Roached backed and was V rated................So I think I am figuring it out.
See to me this looks pretty good. I like this dog..............................

by Ibrahim on 11 August 2013 - 21:08
This is perfect Croup and more important perfect topline. In my opinion with little more forechest development this is the ideal GSD conformation.
.jpg)

.jpg)

by Ibrahim on 11 August 2013 - 21:08
Vonissk, If you like a detailed critique tell me and I will do that.
For the croup, slightly short (remember croup length is relative to total topline length), otherwise very good angle. Please note this dog is slightly stretched, but what bothers me more is his long loin, inbetween the blue markings. I would love to hear Blitzen and Hundmutter comments on him too.

Ibrahim
For the croup, slightly short (remember croup length is relative to total topline length), otherwise very good angle. Please note this dog is slightly stretched, but what bothers me more is his long loin, inbetween the blue markings. I would love to hear Blitzen and Hundmutter comments on him too.

Ibrahim

by Hundmutter on 11 August 2013 - 22:08
Yup. I too think he is a bit long in the loin;
I also wish he had a better tail-set, there seems
a slight but distinct 'lift' just below (left of) your
2nd red mark. Otherwise I think his topline is
very good, as far as the one photograph tells us
anyway. Seems to fit that UK Standard's descrip-
tion I quoted (apart from the actual top of his tail). lol.
Interestingly, in this dog, the long loin in my view makes
no difference to the length of his croup, which I do not
think is steep , but it is maybe a teensy bit short ? **
Thank you Ibrahim b.t.w. for helping to point out something
that I forgot to mention originally, which is the
extent to which all measurements of length and
angles are dependent on the overall dog; a very
large or very small dog will have differing measurements
to a correct medium size dog, even if they are right for
the individual. I think that is what I was getting at when
I said to Vonissk that the differences are miniscule and
therefore everybody may see something preferable to
themselves ?
[Otherwise on this black dog: looks correct size or sl. bigger;
good pigment; excellent ear set, expression (maybe a bit too
'lippy' though ?) rear angulation and pasterns. Good forechest;
I think correct front angulation but he is stacked a little oddly,
like he can't wait to run off after a rabbit or something ! What's
that (pink ?) mark on the inside of his left forefoot ?]
** Oh yeah, just re read your post and realised you did say that !
I also wish he had a better tail-set, there seems
a slight but distinct 'lift' just below (left of) your
2nd red mark. Otherwise I think his topline is
very good, as far as the one photograph tells us
anyway. Seems to fit that UK Standard's descrip-
tion I quoted (apart from the actual top of his tail). lol.
Interestingly, in this dog, the long loin in my view makes
no difference to the length of his croup, which I do not
think is steep , but it is maybe a teensy bit short ? **
Thank you Ibrahim b.t.w. for helping to point out something
that I forgot to mention originally, which is the
extent to which all measurements of length and
angles are dependent on the overall dog; a very
large or very small dog will have differing measurements
to a correct medium size dog, even if they are right for
the individual. I think that is what I was getting at when
I said to Vonissk that the differences are miniscule and
therefore everybody may see something preferable to
themselves ?
[Otherwise on this black dog: looks correct size or sl. bigger;
good pigment; excellent ear set, expression (maybe a bit too
'lippy' though ?) rear angulation and pasterns. Good forechest;
I think correct front angulation but he is stacked a little oddly,
like he can't wait to run off after a rabbit or something ! What's
that (pink ?) mark on the inside of his left forefoot ?]
** Oh yeah, just re read your post and realised you did say that !

by vonissk on 11 August 2013 - 22:08
What does that mean that he is long in the loin?

by Hundmutter on 11 August 2013 - 22:08
Big gap between Ibrahim's 2 blue lines;
oughtta be shorter ! Makes him look as tho' he
has an extra hollow belly ...or as though his
rib cage is too short.
oughtta be shorter ! Makes him look as tho' he
has an extra hollow belly ...or as though his
rib cage is too short.


by vonissk on 11 August 2013 - 23:08
OK thanks for teaching me that...............I have seen that before just didn't know exactly except some dogs you can tell big time and they look bad because their body looks too long.........Everybody has been a big help and I really appreciate it...............

by vonissk on 11 August 2013 - 23:08
Ibrahim I don't know what dog that is but he damn sure looks perfect to me too.........
by Ibrahim on 12 August 2013 - 05:08
by Blitzen on 12 August 2013 - 06:08
I'm going to disagree a bit about the black dog. The loin is the last 7 vertebrae of the spine. The "tuck up" is the flank. I suspect this dog may not be in the best condition since his flank appears to be concave. He may be a little underweight too. Without seeing him move I can't comment one way or another if this is a fault in this particular dog. The length of the flank doesn't seem to be as important as the flexibility. The loin and the flank provide the only flexibility in any dog's back. Otherwise it is rigid. Herding dogs need to turn quickly so a longer flank such as this dog's may be a benefit. Still his flank looks weak in this photo. If I were to fault this dog in any way judging by this photo, I would want to see a longer back, he seems too square to me. As Hundmutter pointed out, his rib cage appears to be too short. He also appears to be lacking in bone. Overall not a very harmonious dog IMO.
IMO the black sable needs a longer upper arm, stronger pasterns,and as Ibrahim said, a more prominent prosternum. I"m also wondering about his feet. Otherwise a nice looking dog.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder
IMO the black sable needs a longer upper arm, stronger pasterns,and as Ibrahim said, a more prominent prosternum. I"m also wondering about his feet. Otherwise a nice looking dog.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top