This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Vikram on 22 June 2009 - 12:06
cheers
by W Miller on 22 June 2009 - 12:06
Warren
by Sam Spade on 22 June 2009 - 13:06
I agree that Nick was a top producing stud, but what makes you say that about Max?
I've seen a few Max Offspring here in the US and have been offered a few by people trying to sell theirs.
I'm not saying you're wrong or right, but wanted to know why you make the statement. Reaching the podium or at least doing well in events is a valid barometer. How else do you know? By that logic, every BYB can say they have the best producing stud, but none of the offspring make it out of their backyards.
How many of Max's offspring are being used in Law Enforcement? Just curious.
by alkster2002 on 22 June 2009 - 14:06
by Vikram on 22 June 2009 - 15:06
I agree that dogs like Max are not for the common handler and Nick lines especially produces handler hardness( Not Agression)
These dogs require to move with the swaya nd not conflict based handling and total correction model.
cheers
by Red Leg on 22 June 2009 - 16:06
by Red Sable on 22 June 2009 - 16:06
by duke1965 on 22 June 2009 - 18:06
the original question was top producing / most sought after
if you look at breedingrecords , and lineups in competitions , you would expect to find offspring of topproducing and/or most sought after males in there at least a few times , if breeders and trainers do not use /desire certain lines/dogs , who would they be "sought ater' by
KNPV?? check bloedlijnen.nl under nesten and dekreuen , gives you an insight there in the lines used
no BS just facts
by Vikram on 22 June 2009 - 18:06
read my post again if you will, I wrote these proven lines/dogs WITH THE RIGHT BITCHES COMBINATIONS IS PRODUCING GOOD DOGS....
try not to be so much keyboard happy :)
cheers & good luck
by Vikram on 22 June 2009 - 18:06
in case you missed your spectacles...
cheers
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top