WDA's request for a TRO was denied by a judge - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Alamance on 22 March 2015 - 20:03

Where does the WDA go now?  Do they have the money to keep their fight in the courts?  With the loss in membership, do they have enough members to bring in the necessary money to keep their fight in the courts?  Seems if true, that the SV said that the only way WDA can use SV judges is go apply through GSDCA, the very organization they were trying to put a TRO against and trying to hold a National trial at the same time as the GSDCA.  Does not make sense to me or maybe I just do not understand this what seems to me a terrible mess.

When will the WDA mess end?  It cannot end or be ignored if they keep taking people to court and that will make people taken to court hate them more and more!  And they should be running out of their group's money.


Dog1

by Dog1 on 22 March 2015 - 21:03

Alamance,

There are old sayings like; digging your hole deeper, don't bite the hand that feeds you, don't burn your bridges behind you, do onto others, that apply to this situation. All sound advice never taken. The WDA continues to deny the inevitable and continues all of the above which will continue to produce the same results as before. 

When the TRO was not granted the WDA responded by saying their shows will go on. Not sure who in the WDA will be judging them but by golly we're going to have a dog show. When the mediation didn't pan out,,,,well the GSDCA may be up for some damages and the courts may have to split us. Split us,,, as if that's not why they are there in the first place. Damages? The GSDCA damaged the WDA? Oh yeah, that's right the WDA is the victim here. The GSDCA caused them all this hardship because they dropped them. This is a real joke. If you check back in recent history, the GSDCA was the one that pulled the WDA into the fold with the scorebook issue. GSDCA bailed them out and all was good. The problem with what the WDA ascertained, is the WDA was a sinking ship long before the GSDCA shunned them. They caused their own problems long before the GSDCA dropped them. 

Where do they go from here? Good question. The WUSV route is doing nothing but making them look worse and there's absolutely no light at the end of the tunnel. They have their own trial judges, well maybe as the tables could be turned. Remember when they so cordially ousted Mike West? Wasn't that a classic. He isn't a member of us anymore so we will go to great length to see everyone knows we are dumping him. Now that the WDA who was the organization that qualified their SVR judges is no longer connected,,,,are the tables turned and are those judges still recognized? The WDA surely isn't,, how can their judges be? 

Anyway, why doesn't the WDA just go it alone. Take your working judges and hold trials. Appoint some people from within to be conformation judges and koermeisters, and just do it yourself. Why do they need the WUSV/SV anyway? 


Mystere

by Mystere on 23 March 2015 - 00:03

Yee's "Please Don't Kill Us" letters to the SV-- which the WDA members apparently know nothing about, made it clear that WDA is not a viable organization, if it is denied SV judges. The V/WUSV response is the March 20 letter making crystal clear that (1) GSDCA is the WUSV member, NOT WDA and (2) that its access to SV judges is solely through the charity of the GSDCA...which is not feeling particularly charitable.

by Alamance on 25 March 2015 - 04:03

Would you be allowed to post here that March 20th letter?

Both he and his second in command are getting just what they deserve!


Keith Grossman

by Keith Grossman on 25 March 2015 - 12:03

"The problem with what the WDA ascertained, is the WDA was a sinking ship long before the GSDCA shunned them. They caused their own problems long before the GSDCA dropped them."

Yep!  It started just after NASS in 2011 and was pretty much finalized (at least for me) at NASS in 2012.


Dog1

by Dog1 on 25 March 2015 - 12:03

Alamance,

There are two letters pertaining to the event. They are available on the GSDCA website if you have access. One releases the judge through the GSDCA as the GSDCA was in the mode to allow things to remain as they were until settled. The other (3/20) referenced here) is a disapproval and acknowledgement the GSDCA is the WUSV recognized club. What is significant is this letter is sent after the mediation. This appears to be the outcome of the WDA lawsuit. The WDA attempt to wrestle the WUSV affiliation from the GSDCA didn't work. They no longer have access to WUSV/SV judges. Send me your e mail and I'll see that you get a copy. 






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top