
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Hutchins on 10 June 2014 - 16:06
This is a 3.5 yr old female. I do realize the positioning could be better, but I think it is good enough to get an idea. All opinions welcome.
by RealDealGSD on 10 June 2014 - 17:06
From what I see which I'm no pro but the look ok. Maybe retake with better positioning.
by Nans gsd on 10 June 2014 - 22:06
Look good to me; I don't think another x-ray is warranted; they can see all they need to see. Best of luck Nan
by Hutchins on 11 June 2014 - 16:06
Thanks nan, your opinion is greatly appreciated. I was hoping to recieve more opinions.
by Nans gsd on 11 June 2014 - 16:06
And you probably will; just be patient. Maybe Blitzen will give opinion for you also as the more eyes that look the better. Good luck though, Nan
by jlb4yoda on 11 June 2014 - 17:06
Look good from what I have been "taught". :)
by Blitzen on 11 June 2014 - 17:06
IMO this is a tough one. OFA might say borderline or mild due to the necks losing their definition. Then again they might say fair. The heads are as wide as the necks. Age would matter, the dog is 3 + years. I just don't know. I think this could go either way. I have to disagree. If I wanted to use this dog for breeding, I'd want to see another xray sent to OFA with the dog sedated and the knees on the film.

by yellowrose of Texas on 13 June 2014 - 01:06
I agree BLITZEN i ALREADY PMED Hutchins , two days ago..
YR

by Weezy on 14 June 2014 - 07:06
I agree, for as good as the socket looks, the ball/neck on left side of picture has definite changes.
Weezy.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top