West Yorks Ch. Show Results - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by paulie on 08 July 2009 - 17:07

.I know that Sue Belfield would not compromise her integrity just to win one class, never mind three, and to be fair,  i cant think of anyone who might,  but Pencil raises a valid point when he suggests that it is possible that an unfair advantage could be gained by knowing which classes are strong, and conversely  what are the the weak classes, pause for thought for all committee members.
   Integrity should be taken as the norm, for what have we left once it's gone ?   my late Father once told me that all that we have is our word, and a handshake, the difference between a good person and a bad, let not put everybody in the latter category.

   Regards, Paul Rattigan.

by A Shepherd on 08 July 2009 - 18:07

The show secretary for West Yorkshire club is Mrs Kay Moore and it was her address on the schedule for the entries to be sent.  So chances are, like at most clubs, the rest of the committee which for this club would include Sue only got to see who and what was entered at the  same time as the rest of you, when they viewed the catalogue on the day.
AS

missbeeb

by missbeeb on 08 July 2009 - 18:07


A Shepherd, has got it absolutely right; Sue had nothing to do with the entries... or the judges, for that matter!  Very disappointing for you Pencil, however, I'm certain you'll find something sinister in it all anyway... you were clearly born on a dark night and have nothing good to say about anyone or anything... you like to be the "victim"... poor you!  I do feel sorry for you, in a way, for you can see nothing good in anyone or anything, one only has to look at each and every one of your posts...

by karen c on 08 July 2009 - 19:07

First I would like to say I did enjoy the show on Sunday as I always do at West York's, good atmosphere and nice weather and a good venue. But as far as no sour grapes, I must have been at another show, every one that I spoke to were not happy with the open bitch class winner. The bitch Ch Daira v Elzmundungsraum is a beautiful bitch well worthy of her title, BUT on Sunday this bitch was in terrible coat and condition and did not deserve to win her class never mind the CC. She was in such bad condition when she came in the ring at first I did not recognize her, and being owned by the club secretary well what can I say, Sue put herself in the firing line. I don't disagree with committee showing at their own shows, I was on a committee for many years. If the club rules allow it, so be it, The committee are following the rules. Sometimes the committee have to enter their own show just to make the entries up.

Penny [Mo] wrote
If your friend got a Ch judging appt and you had a winning dog - would you enter the show? my answer YES PLEASE
I carnt believe that you have written that after the conversation you had with a few of us in the bar at west yorks,  where you stated to us your thought on showing under friends, and it was was just the opposite to what you have written above. But I suppose anyone can change their mind or opinion.

Taz wrote

I don't go to many shows now but it seems some things don't change, I was at Border Union and have never heard so much negativity around the ring, regarding  a top kennel showing under a judge to getting 3 major awards when  (the best way to put it)    he is almost family.
Yet all who were doing the complaining, not one comment. on here!!!!

At Border Union the major honours went to the correct bitches, both bitches in my opinion are worthy of their titles and were in my opinion again, the best two bitches there. I DO disagree with the dog CC, there were other males there that were MORE worthy THAT DAY of getting the CC. This is not because I dont like the dog CC winner, I think he is a beautiful dog that I have used on two occasions. Where I disagree is, I dont think that the kennel should have shown under that judge because of the close connection. But there weren't actually any rules broken, but the kennel put themselves in the firing line for criticism. When it comes down to it, you have to make a choice to do what is right and what is wrong, and not whether your breaking any rules.

by Philip on 08 July 2009 - 20:07

I like to say we enjoyed the show depsite being lost and Terry Hannan coming to our rescue, Thank You Terry.
I would just like to say for the next show, could you   PLEASE have another food outlet; ie, a burger van or something.  As we paid £1.30 for 10 chips as Kerry counted as we were fighting over the chips. But the bar and friendlessness was lovely.

Regarding the judges the dog Judge Melaine Groth presented herself extremely well, it doesn't mean I agree with what she said and her placings.  I could see from some of the classes and placings the type of dog she liked, unfortunately some of those dogs are not my type in my opinion, but the overall winners which were the CC and Reserve CC are a very good type and my type of Dog......   Question mark on what she was actually looking for in a German Shepherd Dog?????
Mr Erich Bosl to me was an excellent judge, he could look at a dog in 2 seconds and know a Shepherd bar from a couple of placings but that is just my opinion.  We would definately go under him again as a Judge and Respect his opinion.     Regarding Sue Belfield, I don't think she has done anything wrong, she has just played her cards right close to her chest like everybodyelse.  Sue's Minor Puppy female desrved to win and the other 2 females again a question mark, which only time will tell if she brings them out again, especially at the next  2 Champ Shows.  Of course she would win the CC as achieving SG 30 under Eric Bosl at the German Sieger Show in 2006, you would not expect anything else then a High Placing for this female.  
At the end of the day you can not blame Sue, as this is happening all the time, if anyone has a chance to win they will take the Politics and use it to their advantage.  That is why all the other's do not come on and critize as they play the same game, that's the way it is, believe me, there was a lot of people moaning behind the scenes but will not write anything but HOPE someone else does the writing for them, which is what I have just done.  I have done it as I am not in any CLICK of Kennels and don't wish to be.  

Regards

Philip
 


jaymesie51

by jaymesie51 on 08 July 2009 - 20:07

There are at present no rules to stop a committee member from showing at their own show perhaps it would be better for all clubs to make it a rule that you cannot show at your own show then that would stop all this bickering about what is right and what is wrong this would apply to committee members only and not club members i know that some committee members enter their dogs at their own shows but do not put them in so if the committee members did this then it would not affect entrys and again i say that this was an excellent show and i thought the placings were correct in the main one or two will be different under different judges and that is dog showing you win some you lose some. ( dont know about the chips tho as their were none left when i went for some maybe you got the last lot philip)
jim h.

missbeeb

by missbeeb on 08 July 2009 - 21:07


I'm surprised at the sour grapes... but at least Karen C confirmed for us all, that that's what it is... sour grapes!   I can see that there is argument for committee members not showing, but there are more important things for us to worry about imo.

I would definitely show under someone who'd previously placed my animal in a good position... and so would you... so would anyone! 

I don't think Sue's bitch has a very glam' coat anyway, but I think she looked great and out moved everything else in her class.  However, it was NOT my opinion that was asked and paid for it was the judges and he saw fit to award top honours to Sue's dog/s.  I'm saddened that anyone thinks it's fine to slate someones elses dog for winning; no wonder Shepherd folk are leaving in droves.

by Penny on 08 July 2009 - 22:07

To Pencil.   you ask in an earlier post...

penny( mo ) can I ask-if i bought a dog off you for showing, and it didn't quite work out-say a tooth missing-could i carry on having FUN as you put it in the show ring or would you try and stop me showing it cos it might blight your reputation.You seem to have a lot to say maybe you could address my question please.

My answer to that would be that I would have no "hold" on you at all with your dog, your choice to show or not to show would be yours, not mine.  Obviously I would not like a Mascani dog to be down the line constantly if judges penalised a problem constantly - and I would be pointing out to you that when you buy a puppy, there is always a risk, and the problems that you will have with showing the partcular animal, and I would hope that sense would prevail, and you wouldnt throw good money away if you were never going to have a great chance.  If the dog were in partnership however, then I would be saying to you that this half of the partnership didnt want the dog to be shown.  In my opinion you wouldnt have FUN if you were giving over lots of money to get ther and enter knowing you didnt stand as good a chance as the next dog.

To your second post.....

Penny--MO thought you would not answer my question.

Well - wrong again Pencil.... sometimes I get a chance to get on to this board with lots of time to spare, and some days I cant get the time to come to it - this is the first day since my last post.

To Karen c.

Not sure you read my post correctly as above..

I was looking for us all giving a painfully truthful answer to ourselves in that position.   Sorry if I dissapointed -but  I know I would be saying YES..... perhaps thats not right and proper... but I wouldnt curry favours beforehand, snd if it was a friend that I had to do with say every week, nay every day, then I would think of them, and not want to give them the pressure, friends are friends but when you see them daily etc they may as well be part of your kennel may then not?  My close buddies dont enter under me (but perhaps its because they think I`m a crap judge too !!).

  I am sure that I was well pleased when I heard Mel Groth was coming over to judge, as we had a minor puppy dog.   What we didnt do was go the extra length that some go to.... We dont entertain her until This Sunday after St Helens, the last time I emailed her was when the fires were on in Aussie to see if she was safe and sound...... and unless some-one else told her of our m.p.d. the first she would have known was when he was presented to her at the show.... this is not that I question Mels integrity, she would know me well enough to know it wouldnt alter our friendship at all.... but it was that I want to know in my own mind, that I havent tried to gain a wrongful advantage (or disadvantage) by "pushing" the fact so that she knew we were entering uinder her or that we had a m.p.d.   I was able to go over to her at the end of the show and give her a bear hug and tell her that I was looking forward to a long chin-wag, and so I am.  Mo



by pencil on 08 July 2009 - 22:07

Penny-Mo.
                   Well at least you replied though history tell a different story-but its ok i won't be naming the dogs on here.
                    At least by attempting to answer you have more about you than videx-on the other hand he can't reply I suppose because its all true.

Back to my main thread( and I see I have a few who agree with me).Its all about ETHICS in my opinion and not many show folk seem to have any-certainly not  s.belfield-your not telling me A. Shepherd that the club secretary didn't know th entries.Still I suppose making the odd pound is important in these troubled times.

 

 


Videx

by Videx on 09 July 2009 - 00:07

Pencil: When you fully disclose who you are, I will answer your questions, without any difficulty. I bet you will find it IMPOSSIBLE to fully identify yourself. cowards on here always do.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top