This is a placeholder text
Group text
by missbeeb on 15 July 2009 - 20:07
Any of the Pencil, Macca, Len lot asked about the health of Malcolm Willis? No! That tells us such a lot about the dross on this board...only out to cause grief.
by macca on 15 July 2009 - 21:07
missbeeb all i asked was if this is the best we have to offer? a CC winning dog with a high hip score.I have had a few conversations with Linda before and yes she is quite honest and forthright. Where do you get off slating me !!! you probably dont even know me or even met me, if your post is anything to go by then i`m glad lol.
I prefer to ask questions and speak frankly, i have even asked the KC to clarify the situation regarding things like this and they couldn`t or wouldn`t reply to me says a lot about them doesn`t it .
I dont know Pencil or many others unless they put their name to the post. I along with many others hope that Dr Malcom Willis is fine and returns home soon.
Have i hit a nerve missbeeb ?? i have no problem with the dog or its owners just the system where a dog with a high hip score gets a CC surely we can put a system in place to stop this like if you dont have a breed survey you cant get a CC ? any thoughts on that oh wise ones.
I prefer to ask questions and speak frankly, i have even asked the KC to clarify the situation regarding things like this and they couldn`t or wouldn`t reply to me says a lot about them doesn`t it .
I dont know Pencil or many others unless they put their name to the post. I along with many others hope that Dr Malcom Willis is fine and returns home soon.
Have i hit a nerve missbeeb ?? i have no problem with the dog or its owners just the system where a dog with a high hip score gets a CC surely we can put a system in place to stop this like if you dont have a breed survey you cant get a CC ? any thoughts on that oh wise ones.
by missbeeb on 15 July 2009 - 22:07
Macca, it's an inane question, if you're aware of KC rules & regs re: judging. No, I don't know you, nor do I want to, given your previous posts.
IF the system is what you have a problem with... you are in good company, most would like to see change, but asking such loaded and leading questions on here is not the way forward, imo.
You have not hit a nerve... sorry! There are people trying to improve our present system and there are "noises" that things may be improving in the future.
A dog with a high hip score... is what it is! Linda, to her credit, will not breed from him. The judge, judges what he/she sees on the day... a fine example of the breed.
by Joyce on 15 July 2009 - 22:07
Macca
Take the scenario of a dog with a breed survey, good hips, but is/or has the potential of producing bad hips/ or any other major problem, Is this dog any more worthy of a CC??? You have one that can do the breed harm, and the other with bad hips who will not as he isn't at stud.
As Missbeeb says The judge, judges what he/she sees on the day... a fine example of the breed.
And until the system changes, both are acceptable.
Take the scenario of a dog with a breed survey, good hips, but is/or has the potential of producing bad hips/ or any other major problem, Is this dog any more worthy of a CC??? You have one that can do the breed harm, and the other with bad hips who will not as he isn't at stud.
As Missbeeb says The judge, judges what he/she sees on the day... a fine example of the breed.
And until the system changes, both are acceptable.
by jaymesie51 on 15 July 2009 - 22:07
I would think that every one who reads and writes on this forum knows full well the current rules re the KC shows their is no health screening which is needed in this country to show your dog the rules are for best on the day in the judges opinion gets the CC so why keep on about somethng that is perfectly legal and above board unless you are stirring the shit or very very stupid not to know this i think the former
jim h
jim h
by pencil on 15 July 2009 - 22:07
ah miss beeb ( another annonymous person ) such irony.
anyhow have you noticed that when a genuine question aimed at furthering the concept of both fair play and also the enhancement of the breed-when the questions are hard hitting there are a little clique of you and your appologists who come on here and try to cover the wrong doings with your inane reasonings.
it is both morally wrong and it is SEEN to be wrong that people are picking up CC's at dog shows which they are committe members of-and also to go under judges that are on the SAME dog club committe as themselves, this is happening far to much for it to be isolated cases,regardless of the the club rules or lack of them, are these people so far up their own backsides that they cannot see that-of course they can see its wrong, but they only have their own interests at heart and couldn't give a toss about the show scene.
anyhow have you noticed that when a genuine question aimed at furthering the concept of both fair play and also the enhancement of the breed-when the questions are hard hitting there are a little clique of you and your appologists who come on here and try to cover the wrong doings with your inane reasonings.
it is both morally wrong and it is SEEN to be wrong that people are picking up CC's at dog shows which they are committe members of-and also to go under judges that are on the SAME dog club committe as themselves, this is happening far to much for it to be isolated cases,regardless of the the club rules or lack of them, are these people so far up their own backsides that they cannot see that-of course they can see its wrong, but they only have their own interests at heart and couldn't give a toss about the show scene.
by missbeeb on 15 July 2009 - 23:07
Ugh... Pencil, you never reply to my questions........ let me repeat; if your main interest is the welfare of our breed, (not likely) why can't you ask your questions in a pleasant / correct manner and apply them to the correct person? I'm pretty certain that Sue Belfield would happily answer your "questions"... if you had sufficient savvy / balls to ask her! I guess that's too tough for the likes of you huh? Of course your objective is not to gain answers or insight is it? It's to cause upset and mayhem!
I advise everyone to click on Pencil's name and have a look at its' posts... everyone a negative, shitty one... no love in your life sweetie?
You are too personal, Pencil... yours is a sad vendetta... we're NOT interested.
I'm not so anonymous, Pencil and frankly, your posts are an embarrassment, grammatically. Learn to use your spell check and take some classes (in the spare time you clearly have too much of) in basic English before you post to me!
by pencil on 15 July 2009 - 23:07
you are anonymous to me MISS BEEB and long may it stay that way.just because i am not a great typist only proves one thing, that unlike you i don't spend all day on here.
but thanks anyway as you proved my point beautifully-you and your cohorts side step the main issues.also you keep banging on about your bedfellow miss belfield-what about the border union show then ?
but thanks anyway as you proved my point beautifully-you and your cohorts side step the main issues.also you keep banging on about your bedfellow miss belfield-what about the border union show then ?
by missbeeb on 15 July 2009 - 23:07
No sweetie... it proves that you are semi literate with a personal vendetta!
What about the Border Union show? Didn't ya win there either?
by jaymesie51 on 16 July 2009 - 06:07
Pencil you go on about how people never answer your questions the truth is its you who never answers questions, so i will ask you again who are you and what is your kennel??? now lets see who answers what.
jim h
jim h
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
