West Yorks Ch. Show Results - Page 11

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Mackenzie on 15 July 2009 - 10:07

I am not surprised at what David Payne's response has been.   I am neither a numbskull or a fool which is why I was so easily able to discover the devious way that David Payne operates.  My  first post was inspired by David's  first post in which I drew on his words and, upon realising this he has edited his post.   The first unedited post from David clearly set out his views regarding buying dogs based on the show  performance and other matters.  This edit is dishonest because it suggests the edit was, either, he wanted to protect Sue's position, or, it is OK when his mates do something unacceptable.

It is noticable that once again he has cherry picked his response and mentioned nothing about my comment rergarding what a prudent and responsible breeder would do etc

Of course owner editing is acceptable but not when it is to be devious as in this case.   David has, on another thread, been particularly scathing regarding dishonesty and now we have the case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Mackenzie

Videx

by Videx on 15 July 2009 - 11:07

Mackenzie: You clearly are a numbskull

Why on earth should I give a toss about you, or your opinion? Nobody else does!

by PATTERSON on 15 July 2009 - 11:07

Lets not forget the Top Winning male from last year. Unsuitable for breeding in the country of his origan. Can any one help and name the DOG ?????

JP

by Mackenzie on 15 July 2009 - 12:07

Your response David is exactly what one would expect from you. You have been caught with your trousers down and you don’t like it! You cherry pick your way through the posts and when you deem a response is necessary you are abusive and offensive to everyone who may have a different opinion. Clearly, you lack the capacity to be polite and respectful to other people and present reasoned and polite argument to your case. Your credibility is out of the window. You are not a leader in this breed and, with the attitude that you exhibit, you never will be. You can take credit for the fact that many people do not contribute to this message board, or, any other dialogue in the best interests of the breed simply because they do not want to be the subject of your loud mouthed bullying assault.

I must, however, give you credit in the small dregs of credibility that you have left, to say that you do give readers a first class service in providing them with information regarding the breed. That is what you do best. Leave it at that and keep quiet, you may salvage some credibility over a period of time.

No need to respond David as I already know what you would say.

This thread is now finished as far as I am concerned.

Mackenzie

missbeeb

by missbeeb on 15 July 2009 - 12:07


Stop this... enough!  If anyone has something to say about anothers breeding practices, have the courage to say it to the people concerned... this is not the place to practice your cowardice.

There is much that many of us could say about others breeding/s and some of them have been spewing forth on here and at shows; in my experience, (life in general) those that bitch the most, are the ones who have the most to hide... get out more, take your dogs for a walk, but let this horrible thread and its' spiteful, jealous content die.

Videx

by Videx on 15 July 2009 - 12:07

Patterson, an utterly irrelevant comment from a moronic coward. The dog is only available for breeding in the UK? DUH! - you are clearly one of the 7 dwarfs (dopey)

(subject to editing - without approval or permission from Mackenzie - as are all of my posts)

I suffer fools badly - now take your time and try and calculate where you two slot in.

by PATTERSON on 15 July 2009 - 13:07

Hit a raw note SNOW WHITE ( David). Please read the comment properly . NOT SUITABLE FOR BREEDING IN THE COUNTRY OF ORIGAN.
So why would it be suitable in the UK.

JP

Videx

by Videx on 15 July 2009 - 15:07

silly prick - what has one got to do with the other? 

you do expose your ignorance & stupidity on your 2 posts

obviously you cannot see it - because your thick

 JP = AW

by macca on 15 July 2009 - 19:07

Now Now people can we have less of the slagging each other off please.
  All i asked is why does a dog with such a high hip score get a CC ?? does this mean there were no better dogs there on the day? and is this the best we have to offer?

missbeeb

by missbeeb on 15 July 2009 - 20:07


Macca, since you appear to be the only one with a problem with this win... why don't you ask Linda herself... I think she's pretty honest and up front... will you recognise such an admirable trait?  I doubt it!





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top