
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Hutchins on 14 September 2012 - 22:09

by Ace952 on 14 September 2012 - 22:09
by Hutchins on 14 September 2012 - 22:09

http://www.arlett.de/sables/index.html

by vonissk on 14 September 2012 - 23:09
by Hutchins on 15 September 2012 - 04:09

by Hundmutter on 15 September 2012 - 08:09
GSDs and related issues, its a very well established, successful & respected kennel,
and she's done more to bring the greys back to the WGSL than anyone else, I think.
I believe she's right about the Southern Europe thing : how many sables do you see
in Spain and Italy ?
But yes there are some inconsistencies in this essay; don't forget she's writing in a 2nd
language. It was also written some while ago - as I pointed out in another recent post,
our knowledge and communications about sables & genetics improves all the time, nothing
stands still or stays 'set in stone', most things are open to question as they are tested over
the years.

by djc on 15 September 2012 - 13:09
A homozygous sable IS rare!! Only the uninformed would think otherwise.
You are speaking about one of the most experienced breeders in the world.
I do believe some language translation could be a problem.
Debby

by Sunsilver on 15 September 2012 - 14:09
Sorry, the text editor won't allow me to make a live link of that, or even copy and paste links. I had to copy it by hand. If it doesn't work when you paste it into your browser, google Lanting-sables-genetics, and it will pop up. Scroll down in the article until you find the heading "Sable Myths".
He says the sable and longcoat genes are on different loci (locations) on the chromosmes, and have absolutely NOTHING to do with each other. If the longcoat gene is less common in sables, it's because the foundation stock of the sable dogs (which are mostly German working lines) had very few longcoat carriers, while the longcoat gene is much more common in the red and tan showline dogs.

by vonissk on 15 September 2012 - 15:09
Thanks Sunsilver for that link. Very interesting read, especially the myths part. And I happen to agree.
I am not uninformed and I do not believe homozygous sables are rare. As I said above every sable to sable breeding has a 50% chance of being homozygous and as many sable to sable breedings as there are, they can't be rare. Also my mentor has been in the breed over 30 years. When we bred my boy to her blk/tan she said I hope they won't all be sable. I told her no way they are rare. And she gave me a lesson that very morning on sable genetics. No she's not considered by some to be one of the most experienced breeders in the world. But her mentor is--Carmen Battaglia--who writes books and does seminars all over the world.
The reason there could be less sables in Spain and Italy is some people don't like them as much. I have never been to those countries so I can't say I have seen more or less. Since I don't fly chances are very slim I will ever visit there.
I'm not arguing or saying why anyone is right or wrong, I am just sharing my thoughts and why I believe them. And until I am physically--like where I can see it--proven wrong, I will continue to believe what I believe. BTW my boy IS homozygous for sable and if it is so rare how in the heck did I get so lucky? LOL
by Hutchins on 15 September 2012 - 16:09
Thanks Sunsilver for posting the info by Fred Lanting. He is very knowledgeable also. I like to research and read as many as I can and than decide what I want to believe in, but yet I am still open minded to EVERYTHING I read.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top