Difference between last VA & V1 - Page 1

Can anyone tell me what do judges look for when differentiating between last VA and V1? What qualities do judges think are lacking when he declares a dog V1 and not VA? Or is it just judges gut feeling. My personal opinion of this years sieger result is Karat's Yoker, Flipp arlett & Yello vom st. michels berg,Quentin Karanberg should have been in VA. As all these dogs have proven their worth through their progeny. I think Dux cuarto flores, Marko, Nando dont deserve VA because of lack of progeny. Please express your opinion. I have seen mostly dogs from Italy and Germnay make it to VA is that also a major factor? As karat's yoker and Yello michelsberg both are from other than these countries. Thank you

Marko progeny is one of the best in the world. 3 times progeny group winner in Italy and VA female and VA nominees son (Tor) deserved for him the VA title. Nando and Dux is still too young to show a progeny group, but I think in the youth classes will be a lot in this year. We will see in the next year.

I completely agree to Baxi, Marko definitely derserved his VA title! See his progeny Tor and his sister! Both are top! and Marko's a beautiful dog! Nando and Dux definitely didn't deserve a VA title as they have no progeny! Dux cuatro flores was favoured as he's the best son of Hill. Hannibal stiegler hof is another Hill son who was expected to be in the 1st 10 V's! But unfortunately failed the Bite work! Other than Germany and italy! Dogs from France made a huge impact at last year's sieger show! THe Siegerin being French bred and so many other top V's as well in the females and DUx cuatro flores and some others in the males.

Hello Thank you both of you for your comments but my main question is Difference between last VA and V1.What qualities do judge think are lacking between last VA and V1? Please explain. Thank you.

Hanibal never failed bitework, he FAILED GUNTEST

Sorry i forgot! Hannibal failed the Gun shot test.