
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Donald Deluxe on 23 July 2011 - 15:07
First dog in the video passed his second chance with a different helper, after the first helper blew the catch and then turned around and clouted the dog with the stick while not engaged (which is what the crowd was reacting to - they were jeering the helper, not cheering). The dogs at 6:00 and 9:00 both received T3 or "insufficient" ratings and were disqualified from the show.
This information can be readily discovered by googling the results of the show and looking up the dog's number (worn by the handler).
by Ibrahim on 23 July 2011 - 15:07

by Sunsilver on 23 July 2011 - 16:07
"Just shove his nose in it, and beat the crap out of him'!

You may say you don't get pissy, but you sure talk the piss sometimes!

by Jacko on 23 July 2011 - 17:07
Thanks for the "rest of the story" because the goal of the thread is to lead one to assume those dogs passed One who breeds untitled dogs, must discredit the institution that sets and monitors the system.
This thread has been a "nice" thread but the attempted message is still the same.
by Donald Deluxe on 23 July 2011 - 17:07

by Ruger1 on 23 July 2011 - 17:07
Donald...Thank you for informative post and for responding to the question about the dogs in the video....I will need to spend some time re reading through it again when I get home...: )
Did you guys watch that cute little Dutchie video ???....You don't think that type of dog would be too much for me, do you ????.....lol...

by Red Sable on 23 July 2011 - 17:07
and thank you Donald (and Kelly) for seeing these dogs as German Shepherds and not making excuses for them because they are show lines.
I'll never understand why people make excuses for them just because they have one. I never take it personally when someone criticizes a WL or a DDR dog. Why would I? We all know poor examples exist and if we truly care about the breed we should be willing to address the issues and try to fix them.
Burying our head in the sand or getting pissy isn't going to change anything.

by sidhimelkel on 23 July 2011 - 19:07
by Donald Deluxe on 23 July 2011 - 20:07
Maybe to you, but I doubt Ruger1 would characterize it that way.

by sidhimelkel on 23 July 2011 - 20:07
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top