This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Dog1 on 21 October 2014 - 22:10
The SV has recently been implementing new procedures regarding size and a more sensible approach . Here's an article with a good explanation of what the goals are. Everyone can bring themselves up to date.
http://www.louisdonald.com/blog
by Kevin Nance on 21 October 2014 - 22:10
Thanks for the read, Randy.
Unfortunately my cynicism prevails; same stuff(posturing), different decade....
The proverbial foxes are indeed guarding and managing the hen house.
Best to you,
Kevin
by clc29 on 21 October 2014 - 22:10
Clickable link: http://www.louisdonald.com/blog
by mklevin on 21 October 2014 - 22:10
I agree Kevin, not sure if this will really help anything at all.
by Dog1 on 21 October 2014 - 22:10
What I find interesting is the people involved and the acknowledgement of what everybody knew. A a lot of good dogs are being excluded from the breed and the current system isn't working. The goals are not being met.
Recognizing you have a problem is the first step to correcting it. As the data is gathered over the next few years, it will be interesting to see if the system is understood and what tool is provided for breeders to work with.
by Dog1 on 21 October 2014 - 22:10
What happens if they gather the data and they cant come up with consistent results, it's too random?
by Nans gsd on 21 October 2014 - 23:10
Dont know Dog1 but who is that beauty showing correct measurements? WOWOWOWOWOWo. "WHO is that doggy in the window"??? Thx for sharing Nan
by mklevin on 21 October 2014 - 23:10
Their working to a statistical mean (average) you can always find one in a given set of data. But there is now five years to skew it larger.
It's like instead of telling your employees that they have to show up at work at 8 and stay till 5, instead we will do a five year study and see when they show up and then we will set the standard (hours to work) based on the average of when the employees showed up on their own.
Completely ruins the idea of a standard. Set the standard and enforce it.
by Dog1 on 22 October 2014 - 00:10
I see you didn't read and/or comprehend the article.
by mklevin on 22 October 2014 - 00:10
LOL, this from a guy who can't comprehend a statistical mean? Nice try, though. Wanna try again? 
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
