WDA'S REDICULOUS QUALIFICATION PLAN! - Page 10

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Mystere

by Mystere on 15 May 2013 - 14:05

Markobytes,

Roll eyes  You are kidding, right?

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 15 May 2013 - 14:05

Please feel free to discuss me and tell lies as I am sure it will be entertaining

Markobytes

by Markobytes on 15 May 2013 - 15:05

Read booboo's thread on Best time to take a puppy home, eight weeks or eight months.

After re-reading booboo's thread it is not clear when BooBoo separates the puppy's from the mother, BooBoo does have " right now a complete litter of nine that I have kept together from birth to 15 months"

by SitasMom on 15 May 2013 - 15:05

"Each entrant must have earned a score of 270 or greater, a minimum of 80 points in protection and “pronounced” in TSB, at one of their organizations National Events within the past year."

"The date of the trial shall be one of the first two weekends in August or the first two weekends in June."


If a national trial is held less than a year apart, say 360 days, and a team scored 271/pronounced in the national trial the year before, are they allowed to into the qualifier trial?

Just wondering.

 

by wallacepayne on 15 May 2013 - 15:05

Well Charles Finley no matter what you think is fair or not fair does not matter at this point for two reasons.  One:  The GSDCA-WDA Competitors got together and forced GSDCA-WDA to do the right thing and the out'come clearly wasn't the crap you are advocating!  Two: The GSDCA-WDA does not give a "Rats Ass" about a Bubbabooboo's opinion!   But, they might give a "Rat Ass" about a Charles Finley providing Charles is half as active with them as he is on this Database forum!  It's been fun, see you around Charles Finley?.........But then again maybe I won't see you around I'm not allowed on your property I'm a USCA member now!

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 15 May 2013 - 17:05

My point was that perhaps the GSDCA-WDA qualifiers that made above 270 were not overjoyed to see the rule changed and more competitors added from their own side .. just a thought.  In fact there is no logical reason to exclude those making less than 270 any more than those making 250.  Who is performing best at the qualifier is what matters as the qualifier is closest to the WUSV itself.  The arguements for the 270 "flunk test" amount to "because that's how we always did it".  Perhaps the GSDCA-WDA will continue the old rules next year or change to a new selection process.  Should be a matter for the GSDCA-WDA to decide internally.  Sorry that you can't come on my property Wallace but hanging out with USCA folks would be a conflict of interest and would not be in the best interest of "fill in the rest from Roetemeyer's annual speech about colluding with the enemy".  You should know it as you apparently support it.

by beetree on 15 May 2013 - 21:05

As far as anyone can tell, you don't own a dog, let alone a GSD, Bubba, so why not let Wallace on your property? You could let your attitude down and learn from one of the best. That would seem to be a lot smarter than what you are attempting to do from your current position of "Nobody".

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 15 May 2013 - 22:05

Beetree .. As far as I can tell (I asked myself) I don't care what you think and it is clear you know nothing about me, my dogs or perhaps anything at all.  I like being a nobody if being a somebody requires your approval.  Wallace and all the USCA folks do not associate with GSDCA-WDA folks or allow them to be members of the USCA because it is a conflict of interest so I am saving him from disappointing his fellow USCA members, his honor, and his good buddies by lowering himself to associate with me as I am a dual sinner and GSDCA member as well.  The USCA membership should also steer clear of the other 3.5 million GSD owners in the USA who do not have the correct GSD as ordained by your Grand Dragons and Imperial Wizard if their dog's name does not appear in the official rebadged SV breed registry stamped USCA. 

by beetree on 15 May 2013 - 22:05

Now the fun begins. Grandiosity plus. I do know more than you know, and if you knew me you would know to shut up.

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 15 May 2013 - 23:05

Beetree .. No matter how much you know it is less than you think you know.  What you know is useless to anyone as it comes at a price no one is willing to pay.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top