
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by darylehret on 13 February 2011 - 00:02

by VomMysticalHaus on 13 February 2011 - 00:02
Thank you both for your imput. He was imported just shy of 2 years old and I did not get him until he was 6 years old. He has only recently(last year or so) started getting "grey" in his cheeks and some, just a few in his chest. I think that is a sign of his maturity though.
Molly, Thank you for the compliment on my old boy. I love him dearly. Here is a picture of him... not sure of the age though, it was sometime between 2 and 6 years of age... large gap there. I have no pictures of him before this one. The quality did not come across like I wished it would have... I can not see any tan on the chest looking at it here in my own hand.

by michael49 on 13 February 2011 - 00:02
.jpg)
by eichenluft on 13 February 2011 - 01:02
molly

by Jenni78 on 13 February 2011 - 04:02
I really don't understand all this confusion about bicolors. Foreign-registered dogs will never be registered bicolor (or I should say SV, not foreign...not sure about the other registries) but AKC does have a bicolor designation. Unfortunately, people think the term means "2 colors" or is interchangeable w/black and tan, hence some of the confusion, and the rest can be chalked up to mix-ups between melanistic b&t and bi.
I still don't see what carrying a black recessive has to do with calling the dog a different color.
Mystical, your dog is a bicolor. End of story.
I find my bicolors are born nearly black; I can see hints of tan on feet, but the only reliable sign is the vent, for several weeks. Then, I find they get darker- sometimes the penciling comes up and only bleeding between toes is evident by about 7-8mos. old. I was really surprised the first time I saw this, but Capri seems to produce this sometimes. The others are all patterned like her- chest stripe, though faint, no markings on face except for very faint "eyebrows" only visible certain times of the year. Heavy penciling and tarheels.
by gucci on 13 February 2011 - 04:02

by pod on 14 February 2011 - 08:02
Christine
It seems to make a strong argument for bicolor being a seperate, distinct pattern that is recessive to the typical saddle pattern--not just a different interplay of the masking gene.
Pod, are you saying that it's not a different pattern, just a modification, like the difference between a black sable and a dark sable? It's not the black recessive--so it's got be something like the masking gene, yeah? But in that case, it's not a different pattern, just intensity.
Yes, I see the variation from darkest bicolour to lightest saddle as a line of continuous variation. There's obviously an order of dominance from lightest to darkest and possibly some incomplete dominance of at over a, as there is in aw over a to account for some of the darkening but basically there are modifying genes controlling the balance between dark and light pigment.
It's not specifically the 'masking gene' that has influence on this, more the modifiers that affect expression of mask. Mask is on the MC1R, the E locus, and whilst this gene can influence extension of dark pigment, for instance an ee dog is white/cream with no dark pigment and an E (maskless) dog has less dark pigment than Em, the patterns that we are currently discussing occur on dogs that are homozygous EmEm. All this Em allele determines is that the dog will have a mask, not how intense the mask will be. It could be that there is some co-dominance again, an EmE dog having less dark pigment that EmEm, but the vast majority of Shepherd are homozygous, so it is left to modifiers of the mask gene to determine the intensity of pigment.
Just a note on the DNA tests. The colour gene tests commercially available so far are not breed specific. These genes variations occur across many breeds. There is though one exception to this that occurs in the GSD only so far; the 'panda' gene.

by Jyl on 14 February 2011 - 10:02
These pictures are from 6 weeks to 12 weeks old...

.jpg)
.jpg)

by eichenluft on 14 February 2011 - 13:02
molly

by nonacona60 on 14 February 2011 - 14:02
Please give your opinion on this boy? .He does have heavy penciling and tar heels...Not sure if that can be seen because of the grass...The black on this markings seem to be getting very deep and the area of black seems to be spreading as he gets older....He also seems to be loosing some of the tan on his chest and cheek....The black on his legs seems to be moving farther down to his paws....He does not have any tan or red around his ears or on his underbelly. It is all solid black..

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top