UScA respect from WUSV - Page 6

loureed if you are suggesting the scores were purposely slanted I hope you have some proof, otherwise to coin a phrase from dear old Phil, stop blowing smoke up peoples asses.  Judging is subjective, the judge does not have the advantage of watching a video tape, and no judge will ever make all the people happy all the time.   I wish I had a dollar for every person who complains about a score (too high or too low) from every  trial (WDA, DVG, USA, AWDF, FCI, WUSV)  because I would be rich beyond my wildest imagination. 

There can be a multitude of reasons, none having to do with corruption.  One is human nature, everyone thinks everyone else should share their their same opinion of an event and can never understand that in someone elses eyes the performance might have been better or worse, judges included.  Sometimes judges screw up, and sometimes they flat out miss things, but this does not mean they are corrupt, and unless people have proof  otherwise, it just sounds like sour grapes. 

If you want perfect judging go get involved with something that's not subjective, in this sport, sometimes you get less points than you think you deserve and sometimes you get more points than you deserve, that's the way it always is, in all sports where judging is subjective. 

lou:

          Does it not take money to put food on the table? Very few people barter for dogs or training atleat not the "Pro,s" I,d imagine.

Making money isn,t a crime, But i,ve found that most people who profess to be "pro,s" aren,t and those that profess to be "Pro,s" on the Internet chat sites are really poor excuses for that. I think Tim Helser profess,s to be a "pro" on here on occasion.