
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 04:05
by Gustav on 07 May 2013 - 08:05

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 09:05
by SitasMom on 07 May 2013 - 10:05
"LAST BUT NOT LEAST YOU DON'T KNOW ME AND WHAT KIND OF SPORTSMAN I AM OR NOT! IF YOU KNEW ME, YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN I HAVE ALREADY SHOWN SPORTSMANSHIP BY WITHDRAWING MY INTENTION TO COMPETE FOR THE QUALI TRIAL. LIKE I SAID I HAVE SOME PRIDE, AND I DIDN'T WANT TO BE CONSIDERED AFTER NOT GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS..."
http://wdanational.net/2013/competitors_results.htm
I dont see Wallace Payne's name on the 2013 results list........
In 2012 he was 4th.
by wplumb on 07 May 2013 - 10:05
WUSV did not set the qualification rules, they just said there had to be a joint event and the results at that event would select the team for the WUSV. USCA and GSDCA/WDA negotiated the rules for how each the participants would be selected. The agreed to rules were each could send up to ten and they had to have a score of 270 or higher at a National Event with in the last year. I d not know why USCA decided to let WDA send teams to the Joint Qualifier that did not get a 270 at the WDA Nationals, however it may have been because GSDCA is hosting the WUSV this year. I think it shows good sportmenship by USCA.
by Gustav on 07 May 2013 - 10:05

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 10:05

by Mystere on 07 May 2013 - 11:05
I don't recall ever seeing your kennel name in any trial results, and from your post above, you don't trial or title. So, obviously the WUSV/SV rules don't matter all that much to you.
by gsdstudent on 07 May 2013 - 11:05

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 11:05
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top