
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by MorganHorses on 21 January 2010 - 17:01
You still have not answered the question about the ORIGINAL DOG that Rae wants to breed. Has the Rescue had her SPAYED?? Simple question, Should be a simple answer.
Helen
PS: I posted my name, what is yours?
by TexasHillsGSD on 21 January 2010 - 18:01
You asked for proof, here you go. This is the first e-mail from the rescue asking for the dogs AKC papers after she has been in rescue for voer 3 months and is still unspayed!
From: Rae Davidson
Sent: Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28 am
Subject: Maggie Mae
Beth,
I need to talk to you. I want to get Maggie Mae's AKC papers. Can you help me? Please put me in contact with the people I can get them from. I've attached pictures that are not the best quality so you can see her.
Regards,
rae
www.GSRFL.org
352-347-5507
I certainly know of absolutely no reason why a rescue would be wanting AKC papers on a dog relinquished to a rescue! They actually had hte puppy application already in the paperwork given to them with the dog but they apparently were too stupid to realize that!
And as for the person who relinquished the dog, she has NOT posted ANYTHING!! The rescue came on here attacking this person!!
Melody,
Texas Hills GSD
by TexasHillsGSD on 21 January 2010 - 18:01
You asked for proof, here you go. This is the first e-mail from the rescue asking for the dogs AKC papers after she has been in rescue for voer 3 months and is still unspayed!
From: Rae Davidson <raedavidson@Embarqmail.com>
Sent: Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28 am
Subject: Maggie Mae
Beth,
I need to talk to you. I want to get Maggie Mae's AKC papers. Can you help me? Please put me in contact with the people I can get them from. I've attached pictures that are not the best quality so you can see her.
Regards,
rae
www.GSRFL.org
352-347-5507
I certainly know of absolutely no reason why a rescue would be wanting AKC papers on a dog relinquished to a rescue! They actually had hte puppy application already in the paperwork given to them with the dog but they apparently were too stupid to realize that!
And as for the person who relinquished the dog, she has NOT posted ANYTHING!! The rescue came on here attacking this person!! A couple of us who are her friends took it upon ourselves to post this as we felt it needed to be brought to the publics attention!
Melody,
Texas Hills GSD

by TStrickland on 21 January 2010 - 19:01
"If you were not so intent on defending a posititon with no truth you would clearly see we mention Hunter's AKC papers in his description on our website and clearly say they are worthless as there is no history of OFAing hips and elbows making Hunter basically backyard bred. Maggie is the exact same. We do pass on AKC papers with clear registrations in the hopes the adopters with get CGCs on their rescued dogs. Backyard bred dogs should never be bred."

by Ramage on 21 January 2010 - 20:01
First of all, ANY dog, even a mixed breed, can get a CGC title. AKC papers are not required for your CGC.
Also, AKC will not transfer papers for a rescue.
Based on the other odd statements by GSDLovers, aka Rae, I tend to think she is probably not telling the entire truth about why she wanted the papers.
Can someone explain why a rescue would adopt out a sick dog or an un-altered dog? I thought a good rescue organization was supposed to keep the dog until it is back to health and altered. Sounds like a few dogs adopted out by this particular organization where still sick and un-altered when adopted out? I do not understand this. The rescues I have known in the past would never adopt a dog out until it was back in good health and had been altered. Then again, maybe things are different now. I really am curious, is this a common practice among rescues these days?

by yoshy on 21 January 2010 - 21:01
the cgc thing was bogus ecuse your right.
I agree with you and that is mostly standard practice. but there is always a but.
working with rescues i have seen exceptions on un-altered or sick dogs being adopted in certain circumstances.
a volunteer is adopting. a very eager person that knows the facts and is continueing treatment/ with added segments of contract and deadline to spay/neuter. puppies needing to be cut after 6 months or on vet rtecommendation foster to adopt scenarios. So its not unheard of.
but standard practice is healthy spayed/neutered.

by TStrickland on 21 January 2010 - 21:01
Regarding your question, it would seem to me that the organization has already stated that their records are an open book. If you are genuinely concerned, I am sure they won't mind you volunteering your time at their center in order to review their adoption practices.

by 4pack on 21 January 2010 - 22:01
by TexasHillsGSD on 21 January 2010 - 22:01
Melody,
Texas Hills GSD

by Ramage on 22 January 2010 - 00:01
TStrickland - unfortunately, I have too many responsibilities to drive over 2.5 hours away one way (5 hours round trip) to volunteer at this rescue. However, I have heard about them and will leave it at that. Whether Beth is trustworthy or not doesn't concern me. What concerns me is the odd and rambling post by GSDlover with wierd excuses as to asking for AKC papers and the comment about rescues and breeding.
I will admit that adopting out a sick dpg does not appear to be a problem. Now that Yoshy explained it to me, I can understand where rules might be bent for fosters or volunteers.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top