WDA'S REDICULOUS QUALIFICATION PLAN! - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 06 May 2013 - 14:05

Mystere .. pull my finger

Mystere

by Mystere on 06 May 2013 - 16:05

Such a rational and adult response. LOL. Why hide, bubba? Lack the courage of your convictions, or are you only able to spout off, while hiding behind a computer keyboard? I hope your dogs display more courage, or you are accustomed to sufficient. Or, have you already slithered back to USCA? LOL

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 06 May 2013 - 17:05

Mystere .. I am a GSDCA-WDA and GSDCA member .. we don't slither because we do what's right without a WUSV ultimatum to force us to follow the rules of the WUSV.  You must be thinking of your USCA brethren .. they slither and then cry like babies when the WUSV spanks their butts for being little bullies.

by Schznd on 06 May 2013 - 22:05

Well Bubba, again WDA is not following the rules by sending dogs that did not qualify, same as not following the breed standard, it's an organization way out of it's element.

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 06 May 2013 - 23:05

The GSDCA and the GSDCA-WDA follow WUSV rules not rules made up by the USCA.  If the WUSV rules say they can't send all the dogs they plan to send to the 2013 qualifier the GSDCA-WDA won't send them.  If there is no such rule and this is all just USCA whining then they will send whoever they want to send.

by Schznd on 06 May 2013 - 23:05

Actually I think they will brake the rules. The WUSV rules and send dogs that did not qualify. They would not have asked if they were going to follow the rules, the WUSV rules...............

OGBS

by OGBS on 07 May 2013 - 02:05

Just wondering why this has to be a UScA vs WDA thing?
Wallace started this thread and he did so because he cares about the integrity of the sport.
It was BooBoo that decided to try to make this about UScA vs WDA.
Why not just discuss whether it is proper for the GSDCA-WDA to send teams to the qualifier that didn't actually qualify?
If you believe they are entitled to compete at the qualifier, say so and why.
Leave the rest of the crap out of it.

 

by hexe on 07 May 2013 - 02:05

OGBS, now you're just trying to be reasonable, and there's no place for that around here.

It does seem redundant that there's a qualifier trial for the Qualifier trial....was there also a qualifier trial for the qualifier trial for the Qualifier trial?  Roll eyes

Mystere

by Mystere on 07 May 2013 - 03:05

Hexe, not quite. USCA sends the top ten with scores averaged from the three qualifying events ( national, WDC,AWDF)to the Selection trial with the ten (?) top scorers from the WDA's qualifier, the WDA national. The top six from the Selection trial make up the WUSV Team.

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 04:05

The USCA does not decide who is qualified to represent the GSDCA-WDA at the qualifier competition for the WUSV team representing the USA.  The GSDCA-WDA and the WUSV will decide what the rules are for picking the representatives for the GSDCA-WDA for the WUSV qualifier competition between the USCA and the GSDCA-WDA.  The USCA does not make the rules, the USCA does not interpret the rules, and the USCA does not enforce the rules.  If the WUSV says that the GSDCA-WDA can send a team of 10 to the qualifier competition for the WUSV team to represent the United States then that is the only rule the GSDCA-WDA must obey.  The WUSV makes the rules, the WUSV interprets the rules, and the WUSV enforces the rules.  If the USCA does not like the WUSV rules they are free not to participate in the WUSV.  This seems to be a replay of the lies and stupidity of the USCA trying to tell the WUSV that the GSDCA-WDA is not a member of the WUSV .. the USCA does not have a choice in the matter as the WUSV makes the rules for the WUSV. 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top