
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by missbeeb on 03 May 2010 - 17:05
Good post, Heather! No doubt it'll fall on deaf ears with some. Glad you don't allow the usual crapola to get you down!
Never, ever have I seen a complimentary post from No Fear (and a couple of others)... there's no "well done" or "congratulations" to anyone at any time... but a bit of success... wow, they're like flies to shit, out they come with all the usual poop... "you know the judge", "he / she owed a favour", "they used your stud dog", "they've got one of your dogs", "you sleep / have slept with the judge" (LOL) blah, blah blah, the list goes on! Do these people EVER LOOK at the dogs? Sure, we all know there are "IFFY" wins... but really, anyone with a modicum of sense would.... check the dogs out first!
Kimi, I think you've had time to think and calm down and maybe you're sorry you started this thread? If so, say so... it would be nice!
by kimi on 03 May 2010 - 18:05
"ALL JUDGES AT THIS SHOW AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT"
IN ASSESSING DOGS,JUDGES MUST PENALISE ANY FEATURES OR EXAGGERATIONS WHICH THEY CONSIDER WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE SOUNDNESS,HEALTH AND WELL BEING OF A DOG..
CAN I ASK
WAS THE SHOW NOT HELD UNDER KC RULES
CAN YOU GIVE THE NAMES OF THE PEOPLE WHO PICKED THE JUDGE
WHY DID THE STEWARD NEED A CATALOGUE.
HEATHER,YOU SAID IN YOUR EARLIER POST THAT ...
AS FAR AS I AM AWARE MIKE RUSTON IS NOT PARTICULARLY FRIENDLY WITH ANY PERSON IN SCOTLAND OR HAS ANY CONNECTIONS WITH ANY KENNEL,,,,,
SO I DID OPEN MY EYES,,
YES HE HAS A FEMALE OF OURS,????????????
AND BY THE WAY YOUR PUP WAS NOT SLIGHTLY LOOSE HOCKS.I WOULD HAVE USED THE WORD,EXTREMELY..
RULES FOR SOME,,
MISSBEEB, SORRY I DIDNT HAVE A DOG ENTERED..
by NO FEAR on 03 May 2010 - 20:05
Have you ever noticed its the same people on here blowing smoke up each others as--s when they win ! Why do you think that is ? Dont see them on congratulating the small time winner ? Oh theres a reason for that ! its called NO GAIN
Heather ! Your talking cr-p ! Be honest , at least with yourself . You want the German system but you advertise a long coat for stud ! Would that be allowed in Germany ? Yea thats right , like the rest on here back slapping each other you ONLY want the bits of that system that SUITS your needs ! Practice what you preach !
by noddi on 03 May 2010 - 20:05
by Heather on 03 May 2010 - 22:05
Fear, I will treat your comments with the contempt they deserve. You have no idea what i want or don't want and what i do is no concern of yours. If you have the balls to identify yourself then maybe i, and others, would give your comments some credence, although i doubt it

You know folks, like i have said before, it's only successful kennels that get the crap on this database and i genuinely see it as a sign we are doing it right. So, we will continue as we are and hopefully keep producing good animals that obviously really annoy the minority on here. No amount of backstabbing or crap about us or our dogs will ever stop us. It just makes me more determined to win!
This thread, as usual, has deteriorated into a personal slagging match and i have better things to do with my time. I normally have no problem defending my own end and even answering sensible comments/questions from anons but when they resort to gutter levels due to jealousy and envy and have no guts to do it under their own name, then they do not deserve any more of my time!
Enjoy your dogs as i certainly enjoy mine!
by pencil on 03 May 2010 - 22:05
i came on this thread earlier to say that i found mike ruston a decent judge, which he his.
but i read your comments above and that is whats wrong with showing nowadays( has been for a longtime mind you ) you continually talk of " US ", tell me is that the clique mafia so many folk harp on about.you go on to say that one never hears the " Big Kennels " moaning when they dont win( thats because they probably win the next show ) But to confirm you argument when a " Nobody " wins do all these back slappers come on here and congratulate them-NO THEY DONT-you included.
and in my opion no one should be allowed to go under any judge that has a connection with one's self, be it stud dog usage, or puppy ownership or any connection that can put the judge under pressure.
and before you ask my name for the umpteenth time is simon black.
by Heather on 03 May 2010 - 23:05
I have no problems with people being anon, so long as they remain civil and i have always replied to them, unlike some. At each point in my reply where i say 'US' it simply refers to me and my husband, nothing more and nothing less.
As for back slapping or lack of it when as you call them 'nobody's win. If any of the people i know win, or a good dog wins, then yes i do come on here and congratulate them and have done so on numerous occasions. There are times, i have missed one or two, if i have been away as i am not going to troll pages and pages of comments just in case i have missed someones win. But, if a good dog wins or someone i know wins, then yes i will congratulate them. If i were to congratulate ever single winner on here, every weekend, it would be a permanent job, so sorry if that is heartless but i just don't have the time to do that.
What you may find is that due to the negativity on this forum, a lot of people, myself included, now choose to use facebook, where there is a large social network of GSD Show exhibitors from the UK and elsewhere and the majority of my congratulations and comments on dogs, and that of others, is done on there, viewable by the many people on there, of which i can only assume you are not one. Like myself, people are now starting to steer clear of this database and i don't blame them. Facebook is far better believe me and all these people who's dogs have won in recent months, if i know of it will have my congratulations there, instead of here.
by NO FEAR on 04 May 2010 - 07:05
Thanks for proving my point ! What breed survey has that long coat got again ? LOL
by noddi on 04 May 2010 - 07:05
by bazza on 04 May 2010 - 08:05
Kimmi, before printing check your facts and READ better. Heather was talking about a different judge to the one you are ranting on about, owning one of her females. So maybe an apology is in order? Won't hold my breath.
Finally before Pencil and co chip in, I do not know Heather on a personal level, I do not own any of her dogs either. I certainly wouldn't mind as I consistantly see excellent animals from her kennel. Sad day indeed when a breeder who breeds quality dogs has to defend being rewarded for that hard work in the show ring.
Miss beeb could you tell me the names of the judges who put it about, I might be up for that,lol,lol.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top