
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Mark3 on 17 January 2010 - 20:01
Whilst I am not endorsing the manner in which it was put across on here, it would seem to me that there is a concern with some of the advice given to the public from GSD info Group representatives.
I appreciate that no one person can enforce what is correct however, as Group representatives, there is an obligation to give the correct information and guidance to the puppy buying public if approached. Anything less than correct will threaten the good standing of the group and ultimately the health of the breed itself, not to mention misleading the public.
Nonetheless, the past is the past, I hope going forward this is not the case and there is no basis for any allegations to be made.
Thank you for clarifying your position Superdog.
by Jonah1 on 17 January 2010 - 21:01
YEE HA TIGERMOUSE HAS NEW BUDDY. GOOD POST MARK3.

by Superdog on 17 January 2010 - 21:01
You should learn to read, I have not had any litters for 7 years
But the puppy I have recently aquired came from lines scored and the same will be done before I start to work her.
Of course now there is only the Breed suppliment to go by and no Year book we will again be kept in the dark as to who has and who has not won't we?
Thanks Mark I do personally give out correct info, regardless of what others seem to think. I also try MYSELF to FOLLOW such. info.
But enough is enough I have not the time to argue, Life is too short.
Thank-you Tigermouse well said.

by tigermouse on 17 January 2010 - 21:01
getting nasty achieves nothing Jonah1
can we not have a civilized debate on here without people getting personal
hence me asking superdog some questions over the phone rather than on here.
by Jonah1 on 17 January 2010 - 22:01

by tigermouse on 17 January 2010 - 23:01
by petowner on 18 January 2010 - 15:01
by spiritinthesky on 19 January 2010 - 23:01
I know Chris Harvey. I know Margeret Nyrvana Jones. I have heard of Mrs Joyce Ixer, but I haven't had the pleasure of speaking to this lady. What I DO KNOW...............is that ALL the members of the GSD Info Group do more to help, preserve and further the breed of GSDs than you, Jonah1, and any of your gobby, misinformed, and extremely badly educated associates.......if you cannot even string a legible, grammatically correct sentence together, how the hell do you manage to be such avid, perfect and enthusiastic followers of the GSD breed???
by petowner on 20 January 2010 - 10:01
Why can't the person or persons at fault admit they were wrong and try to rectify their mistakes instead of scouting around valid questions, clouding the truth by telling more lies and making it worse. Even that what Jonah1 has posted is proving to be correct from a PM I received this morning that included a lady's email address who has also been mis informed about health tests from one person only on the gsd info group I do not agree with aggressive behaviour or the silly childish talk that has joined in late here. I do strongly share the views of Missbeeb. Mark3. Jaymesie51. Tigermouse ( not sure if Tigermouse is sitting on the fence or not ).
I don't know why Joyce Ixer has been brought into this, Joyce I know has nothing to do with it and would certainly never give out wrong information to anyone.

by tigermouse on 20 January 2010 - 11:01
That is a barbed wire fence mate !!!!. lol
I'm just trying to be civil as I do not like to get into aggressive
arguments.
I don't want to make enemies but I dont care to make friends either.
I will support those who do the right thing by the breed and try to
educate those who dont know any better.
I hope that the person will look at what they have done and learn by their
mistakes.
If a member of the info group is giving out wrong information they
shouldn't be giving out information in the first place untill they
understand what they are talking about.
This breed is very dear to my heart and all I care about is the dogs,
I phoned Dot as I wanted to find out where she stood with regard to the
elbow and haemo testing and discuss the DM test with her, I am not a
friend of hers I have only ever spoken to her twice.
I stand by what I said to her with regard to the false info allegedly
given out and the breeding ethics of Chris Harvey,
the info group is GUILTY BY ASSOCIATION there needs to be well educated unbiast people
running such a group and they should practice what they preach.
I have never spoken to miss/mrs Harvey and have not seen the alleged e-mails
therefore I cant really get into a debate with her and I don't even know
if she is a member of the database,
it would be better if she would come on here and explain herself as it might help clear this matter up.
Jumping to conclusions seems to be this breeds favorite indoor sport.
I was once accused of being one of Videx's buddies and again I have only
spoken to him 2/3 times.
I dont know many people in this breed that well as you never know who is
up to what , and to be honest I really don't want to get that involved
UNLESS there is something that NEEDS TO BE SAID for the sake of the breed.
I hope this clears this up for you petowner you are one of a few people I
haven't seen a bad post from yet and I think we are singing from the same
hymm sheet :)
Kind regards
Tracie.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top