GSDL HIERARCHY - Page 3

I write this post with complete and utter JOY and SMUGNESS......
Having read the majority of posts that have been written over the past 6 maybe more months of CERTAIN League members trying to belittle BAGSD members about the performances  and scores from trials that have been held during that time....
So now I think maybe we put a few things into perspective....

WUSV......league members disqualified......The one and only RICHARD JAMES.....(what goes around comes around Richard).....Non Qualifiers.....Henrietta failed in 2 phases.....Eric White did well....(Concratulations Eric !!).....and of course Eric Roberts and Stuart Nye didnt qualify....but then we didnt expect anything other.....

FCI.....NO Disqualifications....Roberts Symonds didnt Qaulify....Carol Phillips...Alan Wood ....Geoff Tordoff and Eric White all qualified.....So this brings us upto
"The Nationals"...... an all League competition with a descent number of entries (19)......How many dogs qualified there then ??? .....eww.... that 'll be a very poor 7....so to my reconing that makes 12 disqualified/failiures

Even  Chris t Bowes (Mr Schutzhund himself) got disqualified.....(not good that Chris...is he up for sale yet ??).... on a ground that is supposed to be neutral (my arse!!!)  .....You know what they say about people who live in glass houses Chris t !!!!!! 
 
And the winner  with Very commendable 96-91-92 score.... Geoff Tordoff.....with his very first Schutzhund Dog.....never once have we seen or heard a bad mouthed comment come from his lips or fingers.....

So in actual fact the BAGSD scores didnt look too bad at all ....did they????

I just want it to be known that I am in NO WAY having a dig at the people who have failed as I admire anybody who goes out on the competition field with their dogs......I am mearly just pointing out that the people that have caused all this shit over poor scores from BAGSD obviously are no better themselves .

Oh....just 1 more thing.....the idiot that calls himself "TAYWAYNE" I believe made reference to the Judge "judging the trial.. as trials should be judged" .....by this idiotic remark are we to assume that all previous trials were not......what a "twatt"  

Thanks for your input Alan Wood.

"Simple" by name ....."Simple" by nature........you carn't blame Alan Wood for everything !!!!!!!

Did that last post touch a nerve......I was only stating obvious facts......that I colated from official web sites..... 

thanks Tom Nye (blogspotter)

Whatever gets it up for U Yawn Yawn go and get a life dick1kenobi.