Personal Protection Dogs can stop this? - Page 2

Agree: using Sandy Hook victims to sell your 'product' is in very bad
taste.

If its good for the commander Goose and chief its good for the gander. This is nothing more then follow the leader.

"If its good for the commander Goose and chief..."

You lost; get over it.

I stopped reading when I read this:  "

Protection-trained dogs can take the place of the assault rifle, possessing the ability to restore security in American family homes in ways that firearms are incapable."

No dog can take the place of a rifle. One dog can potentially neutralize (temporarily) one man. I can take on a whole bunch of men with a semi automatic rifle. Besides, the purpose of a protection dog is to give you time to get your gun.

Keith are you suggesting that side which loses election then can not criticize the ones who won? That is an interesting notion. In my opinion Gigante's premise is true.  Security  is always akin to layers of onion. Each layer is supporting the other and has its own separate function. Dog is such layer. Dog is first deterrent, then warning then protection, in that order. Gun is separate layer and it can not replace a dog and vice versa gun can not replace dog.  To suggest that it can is irresponsible and indeed playing into hands of today's anti gun feeding frenzy.    To remove guns  and substitute a pp dog in order to  restore feeling of security is just that restoring feeling but actually diminishing security of law obeying people.  Thus it is in poor taste to make and advertisement especially if such ad is using such a deceiving assumption on the back of such a still raw experience of Sandy Hook.
Prager Hans 

aren't most biting-dogs more or less banned in several US states? I was under the impression that in many states dogs where already regulated to the point where it was a liability to have one (if it is a dog that will bite, that is). I met a US lawyer who told me you where better off shooting an intruder than setting the dog loose on the intruder.

"If its good for the commander Goose and chief..." You lost; get over it.

Silly grossman still living in the dream of donkeys and elephants, wake up silly, your both the same party, the separation is just an illusion

We all lost,

along time ago....

Your just still snoring, ho hum

Gusmanda I believe that you are referring to vicious dog law. Trained dogs used in selve defense are different thing. Nevertheless I believe in NY state what you are saying maybe truth. However even there are SchH clubs so I do not know. Of course in NY is everything illegal. 
In Arizona  I know of case that 2  commercial area protection dogs actually killed intruder and when the owner came they were playing tug of war  with the body and all was OK. Cops just filed report. 
Prager Hans

Wild wild west........hoo - ah

A dogs gotta eat.

Well I've seen a dude with a gun, drop his gun & climb a pole when I sent my dog on him. The surprise factor of a silent attack is excellent. Yeah, train a dog to bark for sport or k9 legalities but for PP, the silent attack cannot be beat.

 To lawsniffer