
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Pharaoh on 17 February 2010 - 20:02
They were eight weeks old and trying to nurse on him. The drops on my camera lens were puppy drool.

Michele

by VomRuiz on 17 February 2010 - 21:02
Cute pictures! Your desk looks remarkably like mine
Michele,
The ears on Pharoah's dad speaks volumes LOL cute!
Stacy

by GSDfan on 18 February 2010 - 03:02
However my situation I have two adult males I need to keep separate (my BF's police dog -the instigator.... and my stud- who would rather not be bothered but does not take kindly to being challenged by the young male). I don't have outside kennels so with the dynamics of my situation I did introduce the sire to the pups. He is very calm with them, no problems at all, so I allow it to have the pups exposed to the house (outside their pen).
My bf's police dog is clearly not safe with them and I would never even try. When he is in his crate or they are in theirs he is very stimulated and his prey behavior is extremely elevated, there is no doubt he is a danger...if the sire behaved like he did even a little bit it would have been a no brainer to keep them separate.

by Kaffirdog on 18 February 2010 - 09:02
Of course there are males that interact well with pups, but most do not choose to do so for long and I can't see any benefit to taking the risk of doing so.
Here's a pic of my dogs taken from the roof of my old house in London in the 1970's, showing Brooke with her litter, her younger sister, parents and my Miniature Dachshund, the ones that preferred to avoid the pups simply got out of their way by lying on the wall.

by eichenluft on 18 February 2010 - 14:02
Example - my Eagle was wonderful with puppies until he was 3 years old or so - he would lie down, roll over, play gently with them and was so wonderful that I always allowed my puppies to play with him (supervised). Until one day, a 10 week old male puppy got in his face for a moment - innocent on the puppy's part - he wasn't trying to be dominant at all of course - but Eagle gave him a correction bite - a side-ways bite that would have been very appropriate for another adult dog. But due to the angle, one canine tooth sank to the hilt in the pups' cheek - requiring a drain, stitches and a traumatized puppy. Now keeping in mind that had Eagle intended on really biting him, the puppy would have been instantly killed. So even though the correction was actually a fair one, and appropriately given - it was too much for a baby puppy. That was the last time Eagle was ever allowed to "socialize" with young puppies even though he was not "attacking" the puppy, nor viewing it as a prey item, pursuing it or even acting aggressive toward it. Just not worth the risk.
molly

by Lakota of Laurel Creek on 21 February 2010 - 01:02

by Lakota of Laurel Creek on 21 February 2010 - 14:02


by oso on 21 February 2010 - 17:02
by Nans gsd on 21 February 2010 - 22:02
I have had many males in the past that could not tolerate puppies; didn't mean they did not have a good temperament, they just did not know what to do with them and "didn't want to correct them" for fear they would hurt them. Now to me, that is a good temperament; but still why take the chance. Every male and situation is different but for a puppy it only takes one bite that could do some serious damage. Why risk it? Believe me, the male does not know whether the puppies are his or Joe blows. Or care.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top