This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Blitzen on 04 March 2012 - 03:03
Sorry I missed you!!
by vomeisenhaus on 04 March 2012 - 04:03
by Blitzen on 04 March 2012 - 05:03
I didn't realize the older gentleman's dog was such a handful although he was a bit "vocal" lol. He sure did a great job with him. Don't you just love it when owner handlers do so well with their dogs? They are my inspiration!
by darylehret on 04 March 2012 - 09:03
by johan77 on 04 March 2012 - 10:03
by Rik on 04 March 2012 - 12:03
I think Kevin touched at the heart of the matter as I see it. He has a very good example of a s/l proving itself, yet he doesn't expect the dog to be widely used because of his placings. Whose fault is this. certainly not the dog. If a strong protection test was required for placings, then dogs like his would undoubtly be higher. and I think there would be less divergence between the factions.
Rik
by Blitzen on 04 March 2012 - 12:03
A terrible shock, you knock my mock.
What a crock, can't turn back the clock, take it to the chopping block, outlined in chalk.
Before the boat doth rock, or this thread does lock, by a puppet sock, I'm gonna TAKE THAT WALK!
Is that more in keeping with the subject line?
by Blitzen on 04 March 2012 - 12:03
Has the protection test itself become easier over the years or is it the way it is conducted and/or scored?
by joanro on 04 March 2012 - 13:03
by Rik on 04 March 2012 - 13:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top