This is a placeholder text
Group text
German Shepherd Dog - Female
Schokrest Clayfield Vision
ROM
Dam born: 30. March 1991
AKC DL37725601 (04-93)
Hip: OFA: Good (GS-35579G29F) - Elbows: OFA: Normal (GS-EL2542F29)
Breed report
No breed report has been submitted
Linebreeding
Pedigree
Clayfield Woodside Texaco ROM1988AKC D683189 (10-89) HD-OFA: Fair (GS-25467F24M) Sire | CH (US) Schokrest Firestone1986AKC D516762 HD-OFA: Good GS-21759G24M-T Sire | CH (US) Schokrest Blackstone1985AKC D381602 HD-OFA: Good GS-20700G34M Sire |
CH (US) Schokrest Scarlett Runner1981AKC WF048333 HD-OFA: Normal GS-14313-T Dam | ||
Clayfield Tamara v Windigail1985AKC D424447 HD-OFA: Good GS-21446G39F Dam | ROMGV CH (US) Cobert's Trollstigen ROM1979AKC WE330426 (11-80) HD-OFA: Normal GS-10882 Sire | |
ROMSEL CH (US) Clayfield Allways A Lady ROM1982AKC WF241732 07-84 HD-OFA: Normal GS-15927 Dam | ||
Welhorn Clayfld Twice a Lady1988AKC D850859 (11-91) HD-OFA: Good (GS-29157G38F) Dam | ROM/ROMC, TCSEL CH (US/CAN) Nike Clayfield Andretti ROM/ROMC, TC1985AKC D484251 11-87 HD-OFA: Good GS-24352G43M-T Sire | ROM/CSEL CH (US /CAN) Stuttgart's Sundance Kid ROM/C1980AKC WE676475 07-81 HD-OFA: Normal GS-11841 Sire |
ROMSEL CH (US) Clayfield Allways A Lady ROM1982AKC WF241732 07-84 HD-OFA: Normal GS-15927 Dam | ||
Clayfield Tigra of Windigail1985AKC D325254 HD-OFA: Good GS-19172G25F Dam | ROMGV CH (US) Cobert's Trollstigen ROM1979AKC WE330426 (11-80) HD-OFA: Normal GS-10882 Sire | |
ROMSEL CH (US) Clayfield Allways A Lady ROM1982AKC WF241732 07-84 HD-OFA: Normal GS-15927 Dam |
Picture galleries
User comments
This is a dog pedigree, used by breeders and breed enthusiasts to see the ancestry and line-breeding of that individual dog. The pedigree page also contains links to the dogs siblings and progeny (if any exist). For dog owners with purebred dogs this is an excellent resource to study their dog's lineage.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 03:54 am
show some sort of likelyhood. Would have been nice to have
had it back in the 70s.
On the subject of Angulation, This female and Texaco
are some of the pics of the absolutely most angulated dogs
of their time. And, while they produced well they were not Champions themselves. ( Zues of Fran-Jo was a similar phenomema).
My point is that angulation is not what is judged in the GSDCA specialty ring but instead movement is. This is why you can see
faults in other areas. It is because movement is the key to the win, and no matter how nice a dog looks Head, Body or Type wise, it can't beat a better mover.
This is why without Video it is imposible to understand why a dog won over another.
If other criteria ( virtues ) like trainablity, type, longevity etc.
can be rewarded, I am all for it, and agree it should be persued.
Jo-Ann
Schokrest Clayfield Vision ROM by FerrumGSDs on 29 November 2007 - 03:11
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 06:39 pm
No matter how well a dog is perceived to move, what value is he when so many dogs of his time (and later) were heavily linebred on multiple dogs predisposed to early death?
They had better cover lots of ground with each stride as they may not have much time left to reach from point A to point B--given their limited life expectancy. In those days, people were finishing dogs young and breeding them early for fear that they might not live normal life spans.
While there may be no "tests" for dogs predisposed to early death, it would behoove breeders not to ignore these trends when selecting breeding partners. Actually, testing suspect dogs for EPI would be a start as there is a very strong correlation with EPI/SIBO and toxic gut syndrome.
Schokrest Clayfield Vision ROM by Louise M. Penery on 27 November 2007 - 18:11
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 08:59 am
That is a whole other subject ( Not angulation) that can be talked about for hours.
I am really sorry for those who had to loose their dogs in this way.
Unfortunately it happens to MANY lines and breeds and for this reason even military kennels tack the stomachs of their dogs as a preventative measure against tortion.
I have never felt it was a Fair disease, as there in no test to see
who will get it and who will not.
Schokrest Clayfield Vision ROM by FerrumGSDs on 27 November 2007 - 08:11
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 04:23 am
And tell us how old was Aspen when he died?
Schokrest Clayfield Vision ROM by Louise M. Penery on 27 November 2007 - 04:11
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 04:48 am
First let me say that these dogs are many times not as angulated as their pictures. Handlers I think sometimes overexagerate the pose, to get looks from the judge, and audience.
I have been out of shepherds for a while, but I will share my thoughts.
For brevity I will tell you why I think the severe angulation has been created.
The American dogs in the GSDCA are judged on grass ( preferably) only at a trot ( not walking like in germany)and mainly from the side. Quite simply if you view the old tapes of the GSD Gran Victor " Aspen of Fran-Jo" durring that show, you will see that he flew past all the others. When I saw it I was in awe there was no denying his spectacular gate and judged by that hew was in every way the Grand Victor.
If they were made to pass tests for agility jumps and endurance perhaps those area's would be as beautiful as the gait but the system is not in place.
Another concept I was introduced to was the concept of virtue. and this is another reason animals that can win in the USA specialty ring
would not win in the All-breed or European ring. The virtue of fabulous and exciting sidegait is 80% the rule in the specialty ring and without that you can't get a win. Yes, they want all the virtues in the standard but this one when present means that faults in other areas are forgiven.
One thing I see that changes the American dogs is that they are in a Herding group, and the AKC holds them there. I feel this is the reason that the AKC shepherds have thinner faces and less strong jaws. They are not seen as a Working SchH type but more as a graceful herding dog similar to the collie the Belgian Tuveren and Grunendal ( spelling). Still, I have seen many Malanois with thin heads that were extremely good protection wise.
I think another factor is just the human eye getting used to what it sees everyday. In the begining when I saw the american Champion specialty dogs they looked very wrong, but with time I started to see them as beautiful, while still knowing we needed to improve alot of things.
Similarly, I would get very upset when a German bred dog would win if it had the faults that are most undesireable or that seemed wrong to me. ( examples, are Humped back, square faces that are more rottie shaped that GSD shaped, and the hocks that turn inward, ( cow Jocks).
I do hope that these things can be discused here without any disreperct towards one another.
On this Particular female, I never saw her in person, but I saw Her son "Schokrest Denver" go Sel # 2 back in 98 or 96. He was not by my definition very angulated. He was a good mover with a good outline, certified hips, and he was very clean Comming and going, or should I say, absolutely clean. I don't think the owners planned to campagn him as a stud dog though. His worst fault was a that his pigment was a little light.
Jo-Ann
Schokrest Clayfield Vision ROM by FerrumGSDs on 26 November 2007 - 04:11
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:26 am
what si wrong with the american people that they actually bred shepherds to look like this. i've heard all about the flying trot.but why????
absolutely horrific!
and the american show lines aren't too much better today
Schokrest Clayfield Vision ROM by harley on 26 November 2007 - 00:11