Another Unlawful PDB Ad - Page 6

Pedigree Database

Show Line Imported 5 mo. Female Titled Parents
Female for sale

Black showline female for sale
Puppies for sale

(Czech Import) Working Line Male $1,500
Male for sale

Baerenfangs Erbe

by Baerenfangs Erbe on 10 December 2017 - 19:12

Here is a little hint, and look at the posts, he posted. I read the post he had posted on the Civil dog discussion before he deleted it. We all know him under a different handle though. Wink Smile
I'm not surprised at all how the add was worded. But to get hung up on it, is ridiculous.

by JonRob on 10 December 2017 - 19:12

Beetree, the ad says "absolutely no physically impaired handlers" not "physically incapable." Which clearly covers disabled people. Might you be reading the wrong ad?

BE, Beetree is right--sounds like you know this guy? Could you let us know who he is?

by JonRob on 10 December 2017 - 19:12

BE for sure he is not Dach Haus. Unless you know for sure who he is you should not be making accusations. That is slander.
Baerenfangs Erbe

by Baerenfangs Erbe on 10 December 2017 - 19:12

Oh Jon, get over yourself. Stop with all the "Slander" this and "Unlawful" that BS. This entire post is a farce. He owns one of their dogs. The dogs registered name is Noah vom DachHaus and not Congo. Congo is his call name. It's Shawnicus!

by JonRob on 10 December 2017 - 19:12

"It's Shawnicus!"

Now we're getting somewhere. Why didn't you just say so from the start instead of making with the coy little hints that suggested Dach Haus was to blame?

But not sure it helps. Does anyone know who Shawnicus is?
Baerenfangs Erbe

by Baerenfangs Erbe on 10 December 2017 - 19:12

Your comprehension is not where it should be. It wasn't a coy that DachHaus was to blame, it was a hint at Congo and I said read the posts, which further would have given you information who it is. If it was DachHaus there would have been way more dogs under Edit Rights being granted and also created Pedigrees, don't you think?


Dawulf

by Dawulf on 10 December 2017 - 19:12

Where did she suggest Dach Haus was to blame?

As for Shawnicus, do some research and look at his posts.

by beetree on 10 December 2017 - 20:12

LOL! Well, Shawnicus just happens to be a male chauvinist pig! He's the type that believes Gangsta dogs are what the standard for GSDs should be. Too bad for his bank book that his oversized and now dangerous dog was rejected by the Navy, because all he has now is a potential lawsuit on his hands. No wonder he wants to screen potential owners.

Still, I really don't think he is breaking the law by defining his criteria to exclude people who are physically impaired (you were right, that was the exact wording, my oops!), but really we are dealing with semantics. The issue for a suggested lawsuit is based on the use of the word for civil laws that are made irrelevant to this advertisement and when the IMPORTANT point of the verbiage use is as a descriptive word for finding someone who can physically handle his dangerous dog.






Baerenfangs Erbe

by Baerenfangs Erbe on 10 December 2017 - 20:12

When you read his posts and read the classifieds it's quite hilarious.
And when you look up the older classifieds it gets even better. Same dog from three months ago... this whole post, the classifieds from Shawnicus... pure comedy...

susie

by susie on 10 December 2017 - 20:12

 "...as he was selected for naval special warfare mwd but due to his size wasn't the right choice, ..."

Due to his size ?????

Sold 3 months ago, and got him back ?

That's what makes me wonder...


You must be logged in to reply to posts










Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!