This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Berlingo on 29 November 2010 - 20:11
by Abby Normal on 29 November 2010 - 20:11
Sue
I think that very little comparison has been made about the systems, other than by me, and then in the context of punishment for the misdeeds of breeders. As I said refusal of registration and exclusion from showing. In that case I do believe that it is simply a matter of money, and the difference is only the amount, unless the SV have been known to impose these punishments.
Everyone is of course aware of the difference in the schemes in respect of health and breed surveying. But that isn't the subject of this discussion.
As you say, there is always someone prepared to cheat, and I believe that sanctions should be imposed. That way we could prevent those that would cheat from getting a shot at the big bucks upon selling a dog that is doing well, and perhaps reduce the incidence of fraud/corruption.
by NO FEAR on 29 November 2010 - 21:11
To be fair to Geradldine I dont think she was trying to degenerate Solo . We all know Solo has all the necessary health checks etc . I do think she was a bit naive in seemingly attempting to defend Derek Stapleton when the same man wouldnt think twice of throwing her to the Lions if he thought it would save his own skin
by Abby Normal on 29 November 2010 - 21:11
I am probably missing something as I've had a long day, but does a stud dog owner not check the hip score of bitches he studs out to? Surely they would not stud to a bitch with a high hip score, isn't the phrase 'to approved bitches only' the norm and a bitch with a high hip score wouldn't surely be classed as that ?
by geraldine bowden on 29 November 2010 - 22:11
Regaurds geraldine
by ohallt1 on 29 November 2010 - 22:11
I understand you position and i sympathise, the Ir ch i refered to was not siegerland michael but another. Have you realised the true score behind ciaras hip score ? is this why you removed your initial thread?? pretty disgusted i would imagine as was I when I found out
Tony
by geraldine bowden on 29 November 2010 - 22:11
Ger
by geraldine bowden on 29 November 2010 - 23:11
Hi tony, you must not sympathise, as mistakes can be made , but the post that was removed was an error . as i was told the female score is "23" maybe not true but up to the owner to stand up and speak the truth . I'm as disgusted as u are
kind regaurds
geraldine
by Dude on 29 November 2010 - 23:11
A lot of people where fooled by the fact he held a trusting position on a club, me for one
Ken
by geraldine bowden on 30 November 2010 - 00:11
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top