12X SchH 3 - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

susie

by susie on 25 April 2012 - 16:04

Darylehret said: " And then there's dogs of a regional or national level who couldn't get 2 X BH, ha ha.   25 X BH, would probably say a lot more. "

Do you really know what you are talking about ???

darylehret

by darylehret on 25 April 2012 - 17:04

All theoretical my dear.  If it could be put to the test, I think you might be surprised.

Slamdunc

by Slamdunc on 25 April 2012 - 17:04

Daryl,
The training to maintain a reliable performance over time is more of a temperament test than a simple BH.  I have addressed that several times.  Do I need to go through all of the exercises and training?  Let me say this: It is a lot easier than it looks to prepare and compete with a dog and trial the dog multiple times.  Watching videos of trials is easy, training and competing is more difficult.  Again, a BH is simple and repeating a BH can be done with virtually any dog.

darylehret

by darylehret on 26 April 2012 - 03:04

"Reliable performance over time" is kind of like a GPA, right?  SSDD.  Such focus on repetition and specialization can not tell me enough as a breeder, but as a handler, that's probably a useful angle to prioritize your selections.

You've certainly shown stellar persistance in nitpicking some offhand comment I made, so you get the big award for timewasting practice.  And how many more times do you have to say that a trial is more difficult than a BH?  No duh, and so what?!  That's not the point!

Slamdunc

by Slamdunc on 26 April 2012 - 13:04

I nitpicked an offhanded comment you made?   You made a statement and I asked you to clarify it.  You are correct this was a complete waste of time. 

I think Susie summed it up best.  I'm finished with this, you have derailed the OP and thankfully knowledgeable people responded to answer the original question.  There is no point to be made in responding to you any further. 


darylehret

by darylehret on 26 April 2012 - 16:04

Good.  Now quit semi-stalking my posts, and pressing me on BS matters of no importance.  If you need to feel important, go pick on someone in the girl's social forum.


susie

by susie on 26 April 2012 - 16:04

Darylehret: " All theoretical my dear. If it could be put to the test, I think you might be surprised."

1. I´m not your dear...
2. You should start being practical instead of theoretical, might change your mind...

darylehret

by darylehret on 26 April 2012 - 19:04

Just trying to be polite.  I'm very practical.  But so practical that I don't allow myself to entertain an amusing thought?  Never.  You should try being less serious.

Slamdunc

by Slamdunc on 27 April 2012 - 04:04

" You should start being practical instead of theoretical, might change your mind..." That is hard to do when theoretical and the Internet is all that is available. Well there are always those charts and graphs to fall back on.

darylehret

by darylehret on 27 April 2012 - 11:04

Just couldn't help yourself, huh?  Is internet your only friend, Jim?  You must be a real jerk in person, to be spending all your time here.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top