
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Bavarian Wagon on 06 July 2016 - 18:07

by susie on 06 July 2016 - 19:07
It´s mentioned, it´s captured, but ( at least officially ) not rated.
This is just for your information, and does not reflect my personal opinion about it.
by Gustav on 06 July 2016 - 20:07
That dog in the past named Vello, was he considered oversized? Was he an important dog in the breed or just used for some backyard breedings?

by susie on 06 July 2016 - 20:07
Which Vello?
by Gustav on 06 July 2016 - 20:07

by susie on 06 July 2016 - 20:07
That´s what I thought, but I wasn´t sure...
Vello was considered oversized, not breed surveyed, and for sure looking back he was an important dog...
My problem is, today there are enough good dogs that are not oversized, we are not living in the fifties any more, given a chance these dogs could become "important" without the possibility of inheriting oversize to their siblings...
For me the oversized, too heavy dogs are a real problem.
by Gustav on 07 July 2016 - 03:07

by Mithuna on 07 July 2016 - 03:07
by Mackenzie on 07 July 2016 - 04:07
Mackenzie
by Gustav on 07 July 2016 - 10:07
Let's not get this twisted, I am not propagating breeding oversized heavy dogs in general, anymore than I advocate breeding dogs that are soft in temperament; when there are many correct( strong) dogs in temperament to be bred. I am saying that sometimes there are excellent examples in the breed except for singular faults or dogs that having some faults have overwhelming traits that need to be preserved that with compensatory breeding we try to hold these traits and reduce/eliminate the faults in future progeny. The same principle as breeding NZ dogs. Some elitist will advocate never breeding an NZ dog based on same principle. But that would exclude countless dogs and progeny of NZ dogs that have become great working dogs and produced such.
This same principle to my way of thinking plagues the black and red dogs, I said on this forum probably 10 years ago that the black and red (SL ) dogs will not improve in temperament as long as they only breed to ( correct) dogs, ( that being dogs being black and red deemed superior or correct structure) that they deem have strong temperament within the black and red community. Well, overall the temperament hasn't improved at all, and many will submit it continues to decline as evidenced by their numbers in work, competitive events, even the Universal Seiger shows. They must introduce " faulty" blood( working lines and other colors.....yeah I know there are V rated WL but if you understand this breed you know what I mean by faulty because the judges so seldom reward WL with high ratings I can only conclude that they are faulty to them) and since they totally resist this concept the working temperament has not improved. No I don't consider myself a prophet, but just a common sense person who does not view any aspect of the breed so sacrosanct that it shouldn't be compensated for when it gets too extreme.
Look, most know I am a little eccentric to most of the contemporary correct breeders of today in some of my practices and thoughts, but until I see an overall return to this breed in general being a working dog, some of the PC practices have gone too far, imo. But then again, I may have it all wrong!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top