
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 15:12
by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 16:12
aaykay, I will reply to your post about what Manfred Heyne said, I have some work on hand I will finish it and come back to you. For now, I tell you YOU ARE MISTAKEN about Manfred Heyne, and I will tell you why.
by joanro on 15 December 2015 - 17:12
by Mackenzie on 15 December 2015 - 17:12
Mackenzie
by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 17:12
That interview with Manfred Heyne was made in 2004. It is well known to those who have been following the development of GSD structure that overangulation started worsening in the nineties and reached its epitome in 2010 when SV stated in the revised standard a degree of 120 for the thigh bones angle plus a new description for the back "the topline runs from the base of the neck via the high long withers and via the straight back towards the slightly sloping croup without visible interruption’. So at the time of the interview in 2004 Heyne was talking about those VAs in late nineties when ring champions started showing rear looseness, and lack of stamina for work. To prove that Heyne is not against proper angulation have a look at his dog born in 1992 Alf vom Fafnerhaus
aaykay, I think this dog looks nothing like the dog Blackmalinoi posted earlier.
by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 18:12
by Mackenzie on 15 December 2015 - 18:12
Mackenzie

by Xeph on 15 December 2015 - 18:12
by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 18:12
by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 18:12
Look at the 1990 winner HGH
Amie vom Kirschental, she has good sufficient rear angulation
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/dog.html?id=10874-amie-vom-kirschental
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top