Chequers BAGSD show - Page 7

Fancy seeing you here Paul, I thought you said you’d made your last comment? Can’t trust anything some people say can you!?
Its me done too Abby Normal.
For the record, MY final words are - There is no way I am listing stuff here that includes names of people whos details are not already in the public domain. Reasonable people would accept why that is the case which excludes Paul, although I never was counting him on my numbers.
I have already provided , names of people who'd been personally involved in some of this stuff.
Kay Waddington assured me that she would FULLY investigate my claims in which case she will be able to *independently* verify that what I’m saying is indeed the truth.
Why would she not have done as she said? She is, after all, the show manager and BAGSD representative for this show in question.  She has my full permission to release my phone details to anyone she feels has a valid reason for having them.
This offer of contact extends also to genuine official representatives of the rescue, and not just people like Paul who seem to have turned up to sound important.
I cant be fairer than that when some people will never accept what I say even if proof were staring them in the face.
 Not one of the people demanding proof has sought to contact me in this way which suggests to me that your apparent concern has some ulterior motive.
If this thread has done nothing else, it has hopefully highlighted that dates dogs were rehomed are more important to Paul than fostering dogs in homes banned from keeping them .  Strange that. 

How very wrong. I have myself contacted Kay Waddington, who denies having your contact details.
She also states, and I trust her 100% , that she has no evidence from you to prove any wrongdoing with the finances of the rescue they are supporting.


So once again, a rumour monger. How very pitiful.

How cunning leiasmum that you ask Charles not to PM you, and then post a public comment when he’s told you he’s said his final word. Have you considered the reason Kate Waddinton has no evidence is because she hasn't investigated this matter? She's contacted none of the people who's details she requested. And I know this because I gave my permission for her to contact myself. I am still waiting for the call. Does this surprise me? Not at all! She already dismissed probing questions asked by last years show organiser, so why should I expect her to treat me as anyone special? I can only assume she has a hidden agenda of her own that makes her want to impede the public being able to make an informed decision when considering support for BAGSD show.

And after I asked him not to pm me anymore, HE DID!!

Ahh, I see what is going on now. Oh how predictably boring!! You disappoint me. So you and Charles are one and the same, thought so 'Lydia'.

How rude of you to not even know her name aswell, Kay, not Kate.

God bless you for trying, seems this time it backfired.

All hot air, yet again.
Lies about evidence, that doesnt exist.
Lies about foster homes.
Lies about dogs rehomed.
Lies about dogs being bred from.
Lies about providing contact details.
Lies about other people having your contact details.



You & Charles have really surpassed yourselves in disappointing everybody. No proof, no evidence, nothing but hearsay.


I rest my case. Seems Charles is as honest as Paul about having his final word! He has had several! All amounting to a big fat nothing!


May God bless you, and let your bitterness stop tormenting you.

I always thought you were completely stupid Leiasmum. Now I know!

Quote Paul
The UK German shepherd rescue was started by volunteers who left that rescue and started again, this time putting dogs first before mass funding, before politics and before rescue ownes needs

And this just shows what a liar you are.
Since you and Suzanne Syers set up Uk german shepherd rescue you have done nothing but try to close the other rescue down and discredit it due to your differences and politics with "the other rescue" known as German shepherd dog rescue, formally known and as quoted here German shepherd rescue Uk. Your new rescue name was chosen very carefully by you and syers to confuse the members and volunteers already with the other rescue, a name very close to which WAS still in use when you set up!! Just as you have coppied many things from this rescue

Recent examples of you trying to discredit with fraud fake postings.

Firstly. A PHOTO SHOPPED FAKE picture blasted around your site by YOU, Suzanne syers and ALL key volunteers on Facebook profiles  and still remains on their profiles even though the police confirmed to be FAKE and you and the rescue you volunteer for KNOW its FAKE. This damaging picture supposedly taken from a thread. The original thread is still there for all to see , the FAKE PHOTO SHOPPED copy has the posters in the same order but the message content altered and replaced by some sick words. Luckily for the other rescue and its members this could easily be seen that it had been photo shopped and changed, but for those who did not dig a little deeper it would be only what YOU and your rescue had put out. Which was a heap of bull and this is what your aimed at.
This ultimately could have damaged the rescue and not the owner who was targeted. this then affects the hundreds of dogs this rescue homes each year as the largest GSD rescue. Strangely enough Paul you are the photo shopper for UK German shepherd rescue. coincidence? i think not.

Secondly.  You again blasted the same rescue for not taking pleading calls from a woman who was looking after a dog that had been abandoned. You  personally posted that you and the rescue had kindly sorted the lady out that "the other rescue" had ignored and helped by taking the dog and stated  QUOTE "He's SAFE thanks to UK gsd.."
THE TRUTH  confirmed  the same night from the very angry lady who this was about who had to post on the other rescues site to set the story right. She had actually been ignored from UK gsd rescue and it was infact the other rescue that had taken in this dog and helped her. 

Also the two blind puppies Ruby and Roma were and are blind and treatment was just a PR stunt and totally disgusting You conned both public and sponsors. Your show page has removed all connections to these puppies which is was supposed to be in aid of!!


LIES and BULL
Your just full of it Paul Duxbury. I feel sorry for any good organization that gets involved with these people.

Rescue is about the safety of animals and only the safety of them, yet you and your fellow rescue crewe have done their  damdest to discredit another in the hope of its members coming over to you. Should you give a crap about the dogs you would work alongside them not try to tear them apart with garbage knowing its garbage. Two small examples of many where you have done just the opposite with your spite towards a rescue you once worked with. Also your bull regards you just do the website and donate LOL.Please. admittedly the general public on FB are easily fooled. Don't take all posters in the same light

To be honest i,m becoming rather bored n annoyed at the contstant bickering n backstabbing these two gsd rescues keep indulging in.Come on guys,run your own rescues n ignore wot each other are doing.Truth will always come out in the end,the only ones who will lose out is the dogs,coz i for one would not approach either organisation at the present to enquire about adopting,fostering or helping financially.OLI,PLEASE PUT A STOP TO THIS BY DELETING THIS THREAD AS IMO.IT HAS RUN ITS COURSE.Thank you.Carole S.

Regards approaching either, i have to agree Carole. Frightening thought.

Just don't like those who portray themselves as the innocent get away with their bad procedures. They don't deserve to be in the world of rescue. 

Yes especialy when they support a breeder who breeds from unregistered ub health tested stock

 

21 minutes ago Suzanne Syers

• 
  UK GSR group
  I have removed you from the rescue group after several complaints about you kicking with somebody who offered to help. 

this person admitted to breeding dogs that were not registered and she doesnt hip score because "you cant hip score if they are not KC reg"

Bull, why Suzanne have you removed me I was not abusive apart from calling her a BYB which she is, it is not slander if truthful she doesnt hip or elbow score her dogs are not registered, she probably only offered to foster to get her hands on potential breeding stock
Why?????????????