
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Blitzen on 01 October 2011 - 03:10

by Jenni78 on 01 October 2011 - 03:10
I really don't care enough to look at OFA's website, to be blunt. I have no reason to do that. My point was that for people looking for dogs, people doing research, and general awareness, I think a DM status on here would be helpful to those people; if people start seeing dogs whose breeding is similar to their own marked as carriers or at risk, I'll bet they'll be more apt to test.
by Blitzen on 01 October 2011 - 04:10
Sorry, but I find your posts hard to follow. I'm not intentionally avoiding an answer.
Maybe breeders are doing that now, Jenni. I don't know. I think someone did make the suggestion that Oli generates some sort of option to list DM status with the pedigree information. Maybe he will do that.
Why do breeders need to see pedigrees of at risks and carriers to know that their dogs should be tested? Do you know of lines that are not involved?
by Blitzen on 02 October 2011 - 12:10
by Blitzen on 03 October 2011 - 19:10

by Smiley on 03 October 2011 - 19:10
Also, I also submitted her DNA to OFAs CHIC Repository so please think of adding this to your DM test. I am pretty sure I didn't pay anything and the DNA that is stored from your dog might help to cure some diseases some day....
by Blitzen on 03 October 2011 - 23:10
Good idea to also send DNA to the CHIC repository.
I don't think OFA will list the results of tests that were not done through them.
by Blitzen on 05 October 2011 - 01:10

by Smiley on 17 October 2011 - 18:10
by Blitzen on 17 October 2011 - 19:10
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top