
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Red Sable on 02 January 2012 - 22:01
Hopefully Hans is on his way to visit Chrissy and is getting this mess sorted out.

by Prager on 02 January 2012 - 22:01
We are giving her money back against my better judgement. All clients should be treated equal and now she is getting preferential treatment. NOT fair to the others!!!!! Again if she would have let us honor the warranty in the beginning then we wouldn't be having this discussion. Again call me dense, but warranty is written so that everyone gets the same treatment. How many people are gonna be on our backs now because we went outside of the box for her? We all think that we and our circumstances are special. that is just human nature.
I am not sayin that I wouldn't feel the same way she does...believe me I love the dang dogs and yes she did draw the short straw for sure.We have told others NO many time even on this forum. What about Wade? He is ill and has a potential problem with the pup. If he does produce the pictures am I supposed to go outside of the box for him too? Where does it stop? That st why the warranty is in place. All my life I was taught to use the KISS method. The terms of the warranty are to keep it simple, for both parties.
It is hard when you are in this kind of business to keep the emotion out of it. I am just giving it my best shot. Animals produce lots of emotion in all of us.
Thanks
Debbie

by Prager on 02 January 2012 - 22:01
Schaferhunden.....go outside and play with your dog. You need the stress relief.....Have a nice Day
Debbie

by Red Sable on 02 January 2012 - 22:01
Debbie:
Was Wade told of the folded ear before he got the pup? If I remember correctly Wade didn't know about the ear nor did he know the pup wasn't bred by Jinopo.
The girl that got the pup from the littermates wasn't aware of the close inbreeding, and Chrissy wasn't made aware of the overbite.
I think full disclosure about EVERYTHING is only fair, especially when you are buying a pup sight unseen for a large amount of money and high shipping costs (which buyer pays to return defective pup).
It is all about trust and honesty.
The warranty comes into play for things that are NOT known, such as hips elbows etc.
by beetree on 02 January 2012 - 22:01
The correct outcome is taking place, that is good and honorable for you and Hans. Sorry, couldn't resist! LOL

by Prager on 02 January 2012 - 22:01
Again, I need to do my homework on the inbreeding before I spout off.
Can't throw Jiri under the bus and accuse him of anything. He says that he didn't know about the bite and we must believe him. We have been in business with him for a long time and he has been a good partner. Hans did not see the bite at the airport. Again Chrissy did not see it for many days, and she was with the pup.....probably kissing it and smelling that good ol puppy breath. I am not making up excuses, just is what it is....the proverbial s*** happens. Again we are not perfect, but when something comes to our attention we DO try to rectify the problem. Do you think we like this kind of crap to go on?
We always think we are providing a full disclosure.....really we are not the creeps that some of you on this forum would like to believe.
Beetree....I think that i answered your post above too...
Debbie

by ghostly on 02 January 2012 - 23:01
I only hope this teaches the members of this board that oil fixes the squeaky wheel and that there are some really shady breeders out their even well known breeders.
Now to address you Debbie, yes you maybe tired of the crap being said about Hans. What about the 2 pups that you had shipped to a friend of mine in Illinois ( which name will be with held ) . To refresh you memory a bit, this occurred right about the time Han was back in the Czech Republic dealing with his mother passing away. These 2 pups were sent out and when this person received the 2 pups they looked like they had not eaten in days due to the cociddia and giardia.
When this person got the pups home he discover that the male has a umbilical hernia the size of a nickel. After discussing these issues with you ( Debbie ) he was told that you couldn't take back the pups right away and he treated these sick pups for almost 2 weeks before sending them back.
My question to you and Hans is why this person had to pay for the vet treatments and shipping both ways when these pups left your place in Arizona sick already. This was a client that was a repeat customer of yours!! You 2 only refunded him the price of the 2 pups and made him eat the cost of shipping both ways and medical treatment paid to his vet Is this the true way you and Hans work your puppy sales? Is it truly the money talks and dog walks to you 2? You say you are tired of this crap going on, well then I think it is time to stand behind what you sell here and not wait to hope one gets tired of no return call or response to emails sent.
by Schaferhunden on 02 January 2012 - 23:01
You should have been a decent person and told your husband to refund the money.
They way i see it is if Prager Hans was not named on this thread neither of you would be offering anything "So Again call me dense"


by Jenni78 on 02 January 2012 - 23:01
Don't get me wrong, I think refunding her money is the right thing to do in this unusual circumstance, but to pat yourselves on the back like you're solely responsible for justice being served seems a tad grandiose.

by Abby Normal on 02 January 2012 - 23:01
If you have as few problems as you say, I see no problem in offering that as a warranty, and then you will have no issues at all in future - what could be fairer, who could ever argue? I can't see the problem with this anyway, as you would be giving them a replacement pup for *free* so no loss to you. Unless you play on the fact that they will not take you up on the replacement. Am I being dense?
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top