Open Letter to the UScA in regards to the USA Sieger Show - Page 4

I do not have a dog in this fight, lol, but I highly doubt that Mr. Grewe has done anything that requires disciplinary action. The issue of who owned the dog at the time of the show and who owns the dog today should not be difficult to ascertain. It had to be published at the time the dog registered for the show, and any subsequent transfer of ownership would reflect in certain organizations having to approve the paperwork. If Mr. Grewe does not own the dog, all of this is academic. If Mr. Grewe does own the dog, he still may not have committed any actions that are reviewable under a BOI. As an elected official for 15 years, and an appointed official for 18 years, many times actions or decisions are made that violate no policies or statues, but do connote "an appearance of impropiety". I always tried to stay away from these situations by recusing myself whenever possible. Transparency as an elected or appointed official is necessary for the confidence of the organization being represented.
I certainly do not assert that Mr. Grewe did anything wrong in his capacity as an official of USCA. Whether or not it appears that he did, should be available publicly through the transparency of the organizations, that ownership of dogs must take place with. Hopefully, there are simple answers to the accusations.JMO

As always, an excellent post, Gustav. Thank you

Marcopolo!! I´ve sent a personal email to you and told you to beg me pardon: I am the owner of Pützi v.d. Dunischenke and she did a great bitework !!!!

Blueeye, i will not hide my response in a PM, first nowhere did i say Putzi did anything but a Great Bitework ! So i do not understand the point you are trying to make but as you said in your PM maybe I AM STUPID ! Is there not much more to being Siegeren than Bitework ? As for your claims again in a PM that Putzi was " many times V-1 "  well that simply is NOT TRUE !!  Putzi show record is MEDIOCRE , AND I STAND BEHIND THAT COMMENT , AND HERE ARE THE FACTS TO BACK IT UP .                PUTZI was shown once as a 12-18mos and was SG-7 OUT OF 10 IN 2008. AS A WKG CLASS FEMALE SHE WAS SHOWN 5 TIMES WITH AGAIN VERY MEDIOCRE RESULTS, V-1 ONLY ONCE IN A SHOW WITH ONLY 5 FEMALES , V-5 IN A SHOW OF 8 FEMALES ,V-9 OUT OF 23 , V-5 OUT OF 6, AND FINALLY V-7 OUT OF 11 LAST YEAR BUT 3 OF THE 11 WERE GIVEN AN SG RATING. IN THESE SHOWS THERE WAS NOT THE TOP FEMALES YOU CLAIM IN YOUR PM BUT FOR THE MOST PART OTHER MEDIOCRE FEMALES MUCH LIKE PUTZI !!!!!  AS A MATTER OF FACT WHILE LOOKING AT THE RESULTS I SEE THERE WERE 2 FEMALES THAT PUTZI WAS SHOWN AGAINST IN INDY ALSO IN THESE RESULTS FROM GERMANY FIRST IS PAM V HOLTKAMPER WHO WAS SG-4 TO PUTZI SG-7 AND THE OTHER WAS RAMONA Z LINTICHU WHO WAS V-6 IN A SHOW THAT PUTZI WAS V-9. So you please get your facts straight before attacking me on a personal level!  LAST DO YOU DENY THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN YOU AND GREWES TO BUY PUTZI ? I DONT CARE WHAT NAME THE PAPERS HAD ON THEM IN MAY IF THE DEAL WAS MADE IN MARCH OR APRIL THEN I WILL SAY IT AGAIN SHAME ON YOU TOO FOR TAKING PART IN IT. OH AND BLUEEYE DID PUTZI GO HOME WITH YOU ???????????????? IF NO WHO DID YOU LEAVE HER WITH ?  BE CAREFUL I ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWERS AND IF YOU LIE I WILL BE FORCED TO PUBLICIZE EXACTLY WHAT I KNOW

I say publicize it, it's not going to change my opinion of JG at all.  I think he's a selfish,  self absorbed, doesn't give 2 shits about anyone or anything but himself type person anyway.  Whether he did or didn't have any dealings under the table in this situation isn't going to sway my opinion of him in the least.  He's in this for himself.  Not the dogs, not the people.  

Well it appears Putzi was on her A game once she got to the States.