
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Blitzen on 27 September 2011 - 03:09
Is it true that when the SV assigns a hip and elbow rating, that dog get an ZW rating too and that is listed in a searchable database on their website?
by danbee on 27 September 2011 - 04:09
http://www.schaeferhund.de/site/index.php?id=688 It usually works better if you only enter the call name or part of the kennel name and use * for more results.
You can also go here: http://www.schaeferhunden.eu/winsis_x/winsissearch.php?tp=1 to look up the registration info for a SV registered dog and see the actual a stamp rating.

by leoetta on 27 September 2011 - 04:09
by Blitzen on 27 September 2011 - 12:09

by Smiley on 27 September 2011 - 12:09
Hopefully, your powerful photo and experience will help inspire others to test their dogs......

by gagsd4 on 27 September 2011 - 12:09
I have some serious concerns with many of the kneejerk style reactions though. I have heard people absolutely condemn breeding a "carrier" (as well as "at risk").
Here is a problem that I see.......
Our breed comes from 4 general types. Getting a balanced dog, often results from balancing those 4 types in the pedigree. So let's say that Dog X, was a pillar of Type 1. Dog X is the culprit for starting a disease, like DM. If all of those carriers (and at risk) dogs are removed from the gene pool, one the the balancing types would disappear.
Now, what else might we lose by taking out Type 1? Perhaps dogs from this bloodline produce beautiful sidegait, or great color, or strong nerves, or social aggression?????
So by taking out any dog associated with DM you would also lose whatever other traits are there.
IMO, breeding decisions should be made thoughtly and with intellect. Not just as a reaction to hype, and certainly not based on the ability to advertise to the general public.
---Mary
by Blitzen on 27 September 2011 - 13:09
Anyone condemning carriers and/or at risks really needs to get some education about genetics and the autosomal/simple recessive mode of inheritance. Starting with an at risk and breeding only to clears will eliminate the gene 100% in 3 generations. Starting with a carrier and breeding only to clears will eliminate it 100% in 2 generations. There is no need to eliminate any dogs from the gene pool because of their DM DNA status. The need is to identify the at risks and carriers and to breed them accordingly. If a pet quality dog tests at risk, it is a heads-up for the owner to be proactive and watch the dog for any signalments of DM.
In this sense it's "safer" for a buyer to purchase a puppy from an at risk x normal litter than to purchase one that is randomly bred from untested parents. The buyer knows upfront that the pup will be a carrier and will need to be bred to a clear and the resulting pups DNA'd. If a buyer wants a companion dog and has no interest in breeding, then again he or she will be better off buying a pet from an at risk x normal litter.
Once again, the DNA test is not intended to eliminate dogs from a breeding program. The intent is to identify the at risks and carriers and to breed them accordingly. And IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

by CrashKerry on 27 September 2011 - 13:09

by leoetta on 27 September 2011 - 16:09
by Donald Deluxe on 27 September 2011 - 16:09
Hopefully, your powerful photo and experience will help inspire others to test their dogs......"
Ditto. All I can add is that I had a male with DM whom I lost 5 years ago. Looking back, one small comfort is that while it was tough for me to see such a strong, athletic dog reduced to stumbling around, falling on his butt etc., HE didn't think there was anything wrong with him. He even tried to pick a fight with my other male not even a week before he died suddenly, and graciously took any decision out of my hands.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top