
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by geordiegaviino on 14 September 2010 - 19:09
What am trying to say is, i can understand culling a littler if a health issue appeared after the litter was born. Culling for the sake of culling is classed as animal cruelty in my eyes and if a Breeder is willing to end a life just cause the puppy doesnt match the standard then that breeder should not breed again and should be named and shamed so potential buyers know who they are buying off. How many dog owners would wanna buy of a person who has murdered puppies for no reason?

by Felloffher on 14 September 2010 - 21:09
I expressed my opinion regarding faulty coloring and that's all it is my opinion. Personaly, I wouldn't go thru the headache of raising a pup to an age where it could be nuetered/spayed just to place it in a pet home. If you want to call it murder or unfair go ahead it's not going to hurt my feelings. I will leave the SL's alone, if you don't have anything nice to say.................

by Scarlet Akai on 14 September 2010 - 22:09
I'm really just trying to figure out logically what the big issue is about color.
As far as spaying and neutering age it's being done now as early as 6wks... (not that i'm an advocate of it) but, you would still get a dog ( with slightly longer legs) that would still be a great dog for someone.
by utonogian on 14 September 2010 - 22:09

by luvdemdogs on 16 September 2010 - 05:09
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top