
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by macrowe1 on 13 September 2012 - 02:09

by macrowe1 on 13 September 2012 - 02:09


by Hundmutter on 13 September 2012 - 02:09
to sable matings, and researched it a little - but all I could come up with at the time
was rather woolly 'because folks believe its a genetically weak combination and may
lead to health or temperament problems (never specified); or because you get more
neonatal deaths / fading puppies with sable to sable.' There did seem to be a small
amount of statistical information to bear this second point out; but some experts
were already starting to query those beliefs.

by macrowe1 on 13 September 2012 - 02:09

Tala 4 months

by macrowe1 on 13 September 2012 - 02:09

by Betta Wolf on 13 September 2012 - 03:09

by amysavesjacks on 13 September 2012 - 03:09

by amysavesjacks on 13 September 2012 - 03:09

by vonissk on 13 September 2012 - 05:09

by Hundmutter on 13 September 2012 - 13:09
mostly on your side of the Pond and mostly among the Working community. So
I guess that if there were real problems connected with doing it, these would have
emerged. Maybe this reluctance was simply old-fashioned, based on hearsay
rather than anything empirical. (I have an idea I read that Dr Willis did not think
there was a real reason not to mate sable to sable; I must look that reference up!)
Its a different world now, with faster communications, so although I set a lot of
store by much of the established advice & thinking, I also appreciate that some
things change as knowledge grows ...
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top