
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by SchHBabe on 18 June 2009 - 04:06
Yvette

by katjo74 on 18 June 2009 - 14:06

by gagsd4 on 18 June 2009 - 14:06
A white GSD is genetically still black, sable, blk/tan or bicolor. The white gene is recessive, so both parents must carry it, and it acts as a masking gene, covering up to true color of the dog.
--Mary

by Jenni78 on 18 June 2009 - 18:06
Maybe those w/dogs who have another color besides black shouldn't call them "solid blacks" but "genetic blacks"??? Solid black is a dog w/no other markings, period...hence the name "solid."
by eichenluft on 18 June 2009 - 19:06
molly

by Jenni78 on 18 June 2009 - 19:06
Do you agree?
by eichenluft on 18 June 2009 - 19:06
molly

by Jenni78 on 18 June 2009 - 19:06
No, that's not what I meant. I understand bleeding perfectly. I was asking what age you finally agree a dog is solid black.
I just said mine had no white OR bleeding anywhere. Trust me; I've looked all over that dog in the last 6 years and there is nothing on him but coal black. He doesn't even bleach out in the sun like the others in the summer.
My point w/mentioning aging was that any white appearing on a dog of 7 or older, I would say is probably age-related graying, and typically will be on muzzle, etc. Just threw that in there to clarify what I was talking about.

by windwalker18 on 19 June 2009 - 00:06

by darylehret on 19 June 2009 - 05:06
I see a few things I would have edited just a tad, for clarity and accuracy. Not intentionally looking for, but spotted an error in "your" chart, far left column.
My 2-2 Titus bitch was as black as they get, and all of her black offspring with black skin pigment. I remember Molly saying something to the affect that that's not the norm, but the first black dog I ever owned (among several) that had tan hairs between the toes, was a totally novel experience to me. Grant it, she's only 5&half years old now, but I really wouldn't expect her to show grays for at least another 5, if ever. I've since then seen many poor pigmented black dogs, and don't care for their looks.
I love the sables with the melanistic features, but they too, can carry the potential to throw white hairs, even recessively. This pup's grand-uncle was a black, with a tuft of white on his chest. This stems from a gene controlled from a different loci on the chromosome than that of your basic coat patterns. I suspect the same is true of tan hairs between toes, meaning that, if black is homozygous on the agouti locus, that is solid black, despite whatever modifiers from other loci may presently affect the phenotype.
Phenotype may, but genotype doesn't change with age, and that's where some of the confusion around describing color stems from. Not just in regards to confusion about blacks, but I've seen it time and again crop up in conversations about sables, black & tans, and bicolors too.
When I describe "dark sable", I'm talking about phenotype, that may or may not have a black recessive.
When I describe "black sable", I'm talking about a confirmed genotype with the recessive black (aw+a)
If I mention that my dog in the avatar is a "black sable", I can ony imagine the confusion that would cause ;-)
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top