
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by cmandela on 15 May 2014 - 20:05
GSDCA Email sent to GSDCA Members. Posted with permission of the GSDCA.
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
by odinfan on 15 May 2014 - 21:05
"Rest assured that SV/WUSV programs, rules and regulations, and the FCI breed standard will be followed."
If only the last sentence were true . . I wish the GSDCA would follow the FCI standard.
by Richard Medlen on 15 May 2014 - 23:05
Odinfan:
I have no inside tract to any information relating to Mr. Fasano's post but I expect his meaning is that the Committee's programs will follow FCI's Breed Standard. As difficult as it would be, if not impossible, for the GSDCA to change its ByLaws to accept the World Standard, I don't see it happening in the foreseeable future. However, it would certainly please me for our nation to join the rest of the world in the breed.
by SitasMom on 16 May 2014 - 05:05
If GSDCA is 90% ASL owners, and they dog give a damn about working titles and hip/elbow certs, whey for one minute does anyont thing a comittee will have any more lock than the WDA..
This is laughable.

by Keith Grossman on 16 May 2014 - 13:05
What's laughable is your level of denial. When you, Dan, John and bubbabooboo are the last four people in the WDA, will you still be telling us how strong and viable it is?
by cmandela on 16 May 2014 - 13:05
For now only the new Working Dog Committee needs to follow the SV/FCI standard not the entire GSDCA. There is no reason for the committee to NOT follow the SV/FCI standard.
by bzcz on 16 May 2014 - 15:05
So then what's the point? The GSDCA is "re-creating" WDA with a different name but all the same old rules and separations?
Where is the "New and Improved"? What's changing? Only thing I see attempting to be changed is the names of who's in charge of what. ANd I HAVE to comment on the whole budget was "hazy" comment. GSDCA (not WDA) agreed to host this event. They(GSDCA) didn't know what they were getting themselves into??? Whose fault is that?? Whose fault is it that GSDCA - who ran the World Championships - LOST 105K??!?. USCA didn't lose money when they hosted it a few short years ago. So the rationale is that if GSDCA LOST money on the event then everyone else associated should lose out too? The whole letter reeks of GSDCA sour grapes at losing money on an event that was "hazy" to them. To the rest of us the WUSV is not and has never been hazy.
Still have not heard from the WUSV on all of this and don't kid yourselves. The WUSV holds the reins to all the ponies in this country. What it says goes.

by Mystere on 16 May 2014 - 16:05
Keith,
Apparently, there will be at least FIVE people left in WDA. Actually, I can think of at least a couple more who will have to remain with any remnant WDA, because they left USCA under the specter of BOI charges being filed against them. Hopefully, those individuas, should they attempt to (re)join USCA would/will simply not be allowed to join USCA, a la Helser. There is no sense taking back people who ran out, just ahead of potential discipline (suspension/expulsion), when you know that eventually the organization will have to get rid of them via the disciplinary procedure anyway. It's easier and cleaner to just not let them in (or back in) in the first place. Leopards really don't change their spots.
by wallacepayne on 17 May 2014 - 11:05
-
Wallace Payne I've counted five trials between June and November that WDA have scheduled with SV judges, what is going to happen to those trials? I also know that the SV has not said ONE WORD about the GSDCA and WDA civil war nor have they said they will not continue to send judges to the WDA.
1 hr · -
Wallace Payne What's getting old is, both Frank Fasano and Dan Yee are only talking about who is wrong or who is right, who lied and who did not! No one has shown one piece of legal document filed or one piece of court document severed. Like I said, the
1 hr · -
Wallace Payne Sorry I can't type well, Like I said the SV have not shown public support to either GSDCA or WDA. I challenge GSDCA to show where they are getting support from the SV and I challenge WDA to do the same...Don't sing it, bring it!
1 hr · -
Wallace Payne One last thing, the WUSV want desperately to have one member per country where they have two. Japan now have one, and so does Hungary. Explain Mr. Dan Yee, why in the HELL would the WUSV take the WUSV membership from GSDCA and give it to WDA and still have TWO voting WUSV members in this country?
1 hr · -
Wallace Payne Better yet Mr.Yee you don't have to tell me shit. Tell your faithful members.
1 hr ·
by wallacepayne on 17 May 2014 - 12:05
Nia,
Even if a Leopard could change it's spots, it would still be a Leopard just without spots...LOL
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top