This is a placeholder text
Group text
by VIANDEN on 04 December 2011 - 05:12
How many of you would breed a at risk GSD I know I wouldn't.
But some breeder seems to think that it is ok as long as you breed to a clear.
Want are your thoughts on it.
by CrashKerry on 04 December 2011 - 05:12
Based on the results so far there's seems to be enough clear dogs in the GSD breed to not have to breed dogs at risk. But I've said it before, in other breeds you don't have that luxury. In the Pembroke Welsh corgi only 10% are clear, and over 50% are at risk. Eliminate all the at risk dogs you decimate the breed.
by Olga Ashley on 04 December 2011 - 12:12
by sachsenwolf on 04 December 2011 - 13:12
by Blitzen on 04 December 2011 - 14:12
Of course I would use an at risk with a normal if the dog were important to my breeding program and the only dog that could provide what I wanted to produce. Some of the most frequently used GSL's are turning out to be at risk including a few Va's.
Using an at risk adds one more generation if the goal is to produce all normals. No need to DNA the litter, all will be carriers. Retain the best, place the pet quality dogs on non breeding contracts. Isn't that what most do with all pets anyway? The carrier/s can then be bred to a normal/s, those pups DNA'd as young as 4 weeks. There will be about a 50/50 mix of normals to carriers. The intent of the test is to prevent producing more at risks.
I don't see a lot of GSD's from well known kennels listed on the OFA site as being tested for DM. Most of the at risks that are listed do not have any pedigree information and most are identified using call names, not registered names. Maybe owners are using one of the other labs for the test, one that doesn't have an internet data base. I do know that there are a few who are claiming their dogs have been tested and they have not been, so always ask to see a copy of that cert if the dog isn'ton the OFA database.
It's going to be hard enough to find normals and carriers to use that will fit into a breeding program. It's not prudent to reject at risks at this point in time and it may never be unless more pressure is put on breeders to DNA test their dogs prior to breeding them. I don't know how the Germans are handling this.
by Blitzen on 04 December 2011 - 14:12
by Kerschberger on 04 December 2011 - 17:12
I tested the older dogs which were still alive and some still are, and those that I know for sure had DM and died of it. I hope that for the future of our great breed all breeders will start doing this on their websites and the PDB so that we get a good idea how our fight is going.
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/dog.html?id=128215 V19 Stella Trompetersprung (YaskoxOduscha)
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/dog.html?id=30364 VA Dian vom Baronenwald (Hobby x Thea)
are two such dogs important to know the results of as they came from extreme high ranking parents thus a lot of questions can be answered by those looking. Now of VA Oduscha I know she had DM, though no actual proof, the reaction of her owner was clear. OF Hobby I'm not so sure. He died at age 12.5 in Sweden, and his caregiver was not telling what was wrong. So its guess work.
For these two great dogs which graced my life Stella and Dian I vowed that I would be the biggest pain in anyone's rear with pushing this.
So Thank you for your part in spreading the word, its been my babie since the start of the test in 2008, and an uphill battle in getting breeders (especially the big ones) involved.
The best source for testing right now is http://animalgenetics.us in Tallahassee FL, with $45 per test and super fast 48 hour turnaround time, in addition OFA recognizes their result for entry in the OFA database.
I have a graph on this page that will explain in one glance what combinations
produce what results. http://kerschberger.com/HealthDM.htm
Thank You All !!!
by Bhall on 04 December 2011 - 18:12
- If both parents are clear (N/N) then all of the puppies will be clear
- If one parent is a carrier (N/A) and one is clear (N/N) then roughly 50% of the puppies will be clear and 50% will be carriers
- If both parents are carriers (N/A) then roughly 25% will be clear (N/N), 50% will be carriers (N/A), and 25% will be affected (A/A)
- If one parent is clear (N/N) and one parent is affected (A/A) then all puppies will be carriers (N/A)
- If one parent is a carrier (N/A) and one is affected (A/A) then roughly 50% of the puppies will be carriers (N/A) and 50% will be affected (A/A)
- If both parents are affected (A/A) then all puppies will be affected (A/A)
by Kalibeck on 04 December 2011 - 18:12
Good for you! jackie harris
by Blitzen on 04 December 2011 - 18:12
Ditto Olga Ashley.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top