This is a placeholder text
Group text
by malloy on 26 May 2010 - 02:05
MY thoughts that I sent to the USA officers.
As a former member of the Organization and one whom is considering rejoining here soon, I do wonder about you all and your ethics now. Does My Grewe have you in his hip pocket still? Between something like this and WDA decision you truly ARE making others leave you. You will soon be one defunct Organization if you continue to act this way. The Ultimate and very real Grim reality of this is you are doing it. You are no longer "The Shepherd of our Breed" per se. You are the ground that the Herd stomps upon. I would rather be part of the Herd that stomps upon them as of this day.
Chris
As a former member of the Organization and one whom is considering rejoining here soon, I do wonder about you all and your ethics now. Does My Grewe have you in his hip pocket still? Between something like this and WDA decision you truly ARE making others leave you. You will soon be one defunct Organization if you continue to act this way. The Ultimate and very real Grim reality of this is you are doing it. You are no longer "The Shepherd of our Breed" per se. You are the ground that the Herd stomps upon. I would rather be part of the Herd that stomps upon them as of this day.
Chris
by Slamdunc on 26 May 2010 - 02:05
Well, you told them. I'm sure they will get right back to you.
by Schluterton on 26 May 2010 - 02:05
Yep ........ that'll make em see the error of their ways. LOL I'm sure they miss you terribly.
by bgstout on 26 May 2010 - 02:05
I took 8 months to come up with that? LOL
by Bob-O on 26 May 2010 - 03:05
And; you expected a reply?
I must say that I was a bit more eloquent in my January 2010 letter to Lyle Rotemeyer, et al, concerning the direction U.S.c.A. (my opinion here) forced me to make. Nevertheless, I did not recieve any reply of any kind from the U.S.c.A. office and certainly did not expect one.
I'll hand this victory (sic) to U.S.c.A. - they are proven better at burning a bridge than am I.
Best Regards,
Bob-O
I must say that I was a bit more eloquent in my January 2010 letter to Lyle Rotemeyer, et al, concerning the direction U.S.c.A. (my opinion here) forced me to make. Nevertheless, I did not recieve any reply of any kind from the U.S.c.A. office and certainly did not expect one.
I'll hand this victory (sic) to U.S.c.A. - they are proven better at burning a bridge than am I.
Best Regards,
Bob-O
by malloy on 26 May 2010 - 03:05
Sorry but the subject does not always have to be eloquent to get a reply. I got 2 of
them already. It may be somewhat Rhetorical in a sense,but I got a reply, and I think
that is some kind of beginning? Its not who you know, but what do you in this life. I
am a person of action and do not sit and take things so lite. To work in Activism it
sure does not take a degree.
them already. It may be somewhat Rhetorical in a sense,but I got a reply, and I think
that is some kind of beginning? Its not who you know, but what do you in this life. I
am a person of action and do not sit and take things so lite. To work in Activism it
sure does not take a degree.
by VomMarischal on 27 May 2010 - 01:05
I think more people SHOULD tell them what they think. It sure can't hurt. I bet they think we just don't care.
by Wolfinbok on 27 May 2010 - 17:05
VomMarischal,
I agree with you, but I don't have a clue what Malloy is talking about.
It's probably better to say something to the officers like, Hey knuckleheads what are you
doing!!, your screwing everything up. And than maybe suggest a plan of correction,
that you may impart upon them.
I agree with you, but I don't have a clue what Malloy is talking about.
It's probably better to say something to the officers like, Hey knuckleheads what are you
doing!!, your screwing everything up. And than maybe suggest a plan of correction,
that you may impart upon them.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
